Enforceability of judgments in criminal matters is a legal requirement, which follows from the more general properties of judgments - its universally binding nature. This requirement serves as an important guarantee of legal certainty because participants of criminal proceedings can't foresee the consequences of their activities in the field of criminal justice, be confident of the immutability of its officially recognized status and rely on the fact that their rights will have a real legal defence, without execution of an enforceable judicial act. At the same time, the enforceability is a guarantee of the right to judicial protection, since only the implementation of the decisions contained in the judicial act, provides a remedy. The presence properties enforceability of a judgment does not preclude the possibility of the establishment of the law suspending its execution. In the article the author substantiate a necessity to include in the Criminal Procedure Act the possibility of suspending the execution of court decisions in the case of a revision in cassation or supervision order.
judgment, sentence, legal force of a court decision, feasibility, generally binding character, suspend enforcing court decisions
1. Aliev M. Puti usovershenstvovaniya poryadka rassmotreniya nadzornyh zhalob i predstavleniy // Ros. yusticiya. 2004. № 4. S. 59, 60.
2. Vishnevskiy G. A. Deystvie principa res judicata kak neobhodimoe uslovie obespecheniya spravedlivosti // Sovremennoe pravo. 2013. № 11. S. 76-83.
3. Doroshkov V. V. Mirovoy sud'ya. Istoricheskie, organizacionnye i processual'nye aspekty deyatel'nosti. M, 2004. 320 s.
4. Evropeyskiy sud po pravam cheloveka. Izbrannye resheniya: v 2 t. T. 2. / predsedatel' red. koll. V. A. Tumanov. M., 2000. 808 s.
5. Kovtun N. N., Podshibyakin A. S. Proizvodstvo v sude nadzornoy instancii: voprosov bol'she, chem otvetov // Ros. sud'ya. 2002. № 9. S. 15-22.
6. Komissarov K. I. Teoreticheskie osnovy sudebnogo nadzora v sfere grazhdanskogo sudoproizvodstva: avtoref. dis. … d-ra yurid. nauk. Sverdlovsk, 1971. 44 s.
7. Osmanov T. S. Processual'nyy poryadok rassmotreniya nadzornoy zhaloby (predstavleniya) po UPK RF // Ros. sud'ya. 2005. № 2. S. 25-29.
8. Perlov I. D. Nadzornoe proizvodstvo v ugolovnom processe. M, 1974. 256 s.
9. Delo Brumaresku protiv Rumynii (Brumarescu v. Romania): postanovlenie Bol'shoy Palaty Evropeyskogo Suda po pravam cheloveka ot 28 oktyabrya 1999 g. (zhaloba № 28342/95). [Elektronnyy resurs]. Dostup iz elektronnogo periodicheskogo spravochnika «Sistema GARANT».
10. Po delu o proverke konstitucionnosti polozheniy stat'i 90 Ugolovno-processual'nogo kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federacii v svyazi s zhaloboy grazhdan V. D. Vlasenko i E. A. Vlasenko: postanovlenie Konstitucionnogo suda RF ot 21 dekabrya 2011 g. № 30-P // Ros. gaz. 2012. 11 yanv.
11. Teoriya ugolovnogo processa: prezumpcii i preyudicii: monografiya / pod red. d-ra yurid. nauk N. A. Kolokolova. M., 2012. 496 s.
12. Ustav ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva dlya Germanskoy imperii s zakonom o vvedenii ego v deystvie 1 fevralya 1877 g. / per. I. Soboleva. SPb, 1878. 120 s.
13. Foynickiy I. Ya. Kurs ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva. SPb., 1996. T. II. 606 s.
14. Scherba S., Chaschina I. Novyy zakon o preyudicii v ugolovnom processe: suschnost' i znachenie // Ugolovnoe pravo. 2010. № 3. S. 103-109.
15. Code d’instruction criminelle et Code pénal. Paris: Libraire Dalloz, 1912. 635 p.
