The article discusses importance of interaction between investigators and operational units’ personnel for effective documentation of bribery. The authors analyze structural and substantive elements of cooperation between the given subjects at different stages of criminal prosecution: operative checkup, preliminary investigation and trial. On the basis of practical experience the authors reveal existing problems of interaction which are viewed as the result of errors in organization and tactics of investigative actions and operational-search activities, as well as gaps in current legal regulations. At the same time the article offers and justifies specific suggestions on resolving these issues and improving documentation of crimes of the given kind. The authors conclude that the most effective form of interaction in bribery cases is properly organized work of specialized operative-investigative groups. At this point the investigator should interact with operational personnel not only at the time of implementing operational assignments, but before this stage in order to correct operational work on collecting evidence.
documentation of bribery, operative personnel, investigator, forms of interaction, operative support
1. Polyakov M. P. Otraslevoe rassledovanie v sisteme form dosudebnoy podgotovki ugolovnyh del // Vestnik Udmurt. un-ta. 1999. № 6. S. 39-41.
2. Ugolovno-processual'nyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federacii: feder. zakon ot 18 dekabrya 2001 g. № 174-FZ (v red. ot 23.06.2016) // SZ RF. 2001. № 52. Ch. I. St. 4921.
3. Ob utverzhdenii Instrukcii o poryadke priema, registracii i razresheniya v territorial'nyh organah Ministerstva vnutrennih del Rossiyskoy Federacii zayavleniy i soobscheniy o prestupleniyah, ob administrativnyh pravonarusheniyah, o proisshestviyah: prikaz MVD Rossii ot 29 avgusta 2014 g. № 736 // Ros. gaz. 2014. № 260.
4. Ob operativno-rozysknoy deyatel'nosti: feder. zakon ot 12 avgusta 1995 g. № 144-FZ (v red. ot 29.06.2015) // SZ RF. 1995. № 33. St. 3349.
5. Belkin A. R. Teoriya dokazyvaniya v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve. M., 2005.
6. Larin A. M. Rassledovanie po ugolovnomu delu: processual'nye funkcii. M., 1986.
7. Lubin A. F. Organizacionno-takticheskie osobennosti vzaimodeystviya sledovatelya s organami doznaniya pri rassledovanii otdel'nyh vidov prestupleniy // Osobennosti rassledovaniya otdel'nyh vidov i grupp prestupleniy: mezhvuz. sb. nauch. tr. Sverdlovsk, 1980.
8. Strogovich M. S. Kurs sovetskogo ugolovnogo processa: v 2-h t. M., 1970. T. 2.
9. Operativno-razysknaya deyatel'nost' i ugolovnyy process: ucheb.-prakt. posobie / pod obsch. red. V. V. Chernikova, V. Ya. Kikotya. M., 2002.
10. Volkov I. M. K voprosu ob operativno-rozysknom soprovozhdenii predvaritel'nogo sledstviya // Informacionnyy byulleten' Sledstvennogo komiteta MVD Rossii. 1996. № 1 (86). S. 19-24.
11. Danilkin I. A. Vzaimodeystvie sledovateley i specialistov ekspertno-kriminalisticheskih podrazdeleniy organov vnutrennih del // Sudebnaya ekspertiza. 2008. № 2. S. 106-112.
12. Kachalov V. V. Nekotorye problemy predmeta polucheniya vzyatki // Vestnik Volgogradskoy akademii MVD Rossii. 2016. № 3 (36). S. 54-59.
