The institute of active repentance as the basis of release from criminal liability, has a number of theoretical and practical problems, namely: questions of a ratio of notes to articles of Special part and p. 1 art. 75 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation; questions of repeated release on not rehabilitating bases; the questions connected with public danger of the personality and with indemnification. For elimination of legislative gaps, in article definition of surrender is offered, are allocated an ideal and real appearance, types of contribution are also allocated to disclosure and (or) investigation. Taking into account opinions of authoritative scientists and jurists, and also the generalized analysis of investigative jurisprudence, offers on change and addition p. 1 by art. 75 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, resolutions of Plenums of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation "About application by courts of the legislation regulating the bases and an order of release from criminal liability" and "About practice of appointment of criminal penalty as courts of the Russian Federation" are made.
active repentance, release from criminal liability, public danger of the personality, surrender, contribution to disclosure and investigation, harm, damage
1. Sabitov R. A. Kvalifikaciya povedeniya lica posle soversheniya prestupleniya. Omsk, 1986.
2. Monitoring obschestvennogo mneniya kak sposob ocenki deyatel'nosti rossiyskoy policii / A. P. Alekseeva [i dr.] // Vestnik Volgogradskoy akademii MVD Rossii. 2015. № 4 (35). S. 50-57.
3. Alekseeva A. P. Dorozhnaya karta dal'neyshego reformirovaniya organov vnutrennih del Rossiyskoy Federacii (kadrovyy professionalizm, otkrytost' dlya doveriya i optimizaciya): problemy i perspektivy realizacii // Yuridicheskaya nauka i pravoohranitel'naya praktika. 2012. № 4 (22). S. 16-20.
4. Mihaylenko A. R. Vozbuzhdenie ugolovnogo dela v sovetskom ugolovnom processe. Saratov, 1975.
5. Aleschenko S. V. K voprosu o sootnoshenii ponyatiy «yavka s povinnoy» i «dobrovol'noe soobschenie o sovershennom prestuplenii» // Vestnik Volgogr. gos. un-ta. Ser. 5: Yurisprudenciya. 2006. № 8. S. 137-142.
6. Byhovec N. I. Yavka s povinnoy i ee realizaciya v operativno-razysknoy deyatel'nosti: dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. M., 2006.
7. Gerasimova E. K. Yavka s povinnoy. M., 1980.
8. Karuzin V., Muhamedzyanov I. Processual'noe oformlenie yavki s povinnoy // Zakonnost'. 1999. № 8. S. 19-20.
9. Leykina N. S. Lichnost' prestupnika i ugolovnaya otvetstvennost': monogr. L., 1968.
10. Pastarnak E. Yu. Rol' poterpevshego v realizacii instituta osvobozhdeniya ot ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti // Ekonomika, sociologiya i pravo. 2013. № 12. S. 147-150.
11. Yadzhin N. V. Psihologiya yavki s povinnoy i taktika proverki zayavleniy yavivshegosya: avtoref. dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. M., 1998.
12. Stadnik M. A. Rezul'taty issledovaniya materialov ugolovnyh del (rukopis'). SPb., 2016.
13. Zhogin N. V., Fatkullin F. N. Vozbuzhdenie ugolovnogo dela. M., 1961.
