GENESIS OF JUDICIAL POWER IN THE REPUBLIC OF KAZAKHSTAN: BACKGROUND AND PERSPECTIVES FOR EXPANSION OF JUDICIAL CONTROL OF INVESTIGATIVE JUDGE FOR THE PRE-TRIAL PROCEEDINGS
Abstract and keywords
Abstract (English):
Issue of introducing into the criminal proceeding of the figure of investigative judge to be made a party of the proceeding has always generated scientific interest in the Republic of Kazakhstan and in the Russian Federation, as well. One the most important priorities of proceedings reform in Kazakhstan is strengthening the judicial control of pre-trial proceedings by expanding the principal of controversy of criminal proceeding and raising of court’s credibility as of independent and unbiased body. Based on the experience of the Russian school of thought and the experience of legal system of CIS countries, Kazakhstan has adopted a new criminal procedure code in 2014 and its main provisions comply with international standards of delivery of justice. One of the novelties was introducing a new participant into the criminal proceeding - investigative judge. Although, investigative judge is a representative of judicial corps, he/she is distant of the other general jurisdiction judge opinion’s influence, since his/her powers and duties are limited by only judicial control of pre-trial proceedings and he/she has no right to take part in further criminal proceeding. The article provides the analysis of the gradual reform of judicial control, starting with the procedures of judicial sanctioning of arrest by general jurisdiction judge, up to their displacement by the supervisory control of autonomous investigative judge, with further delimiting of judicial control and prosecutor’s supervision competences. The emphasis is put on strictly judicial, no the investigative, form of power imposed on the investigative judge. Prospects for further scientific research on the proposed topic are considered.

Keywords:
criminal proceedings, judicial power, principles, functions, prosecutor’s supervision, operative judicial control, investigative judge, prosecutor, pre-trial investigation, powers and duties of investigative judge
Text
Text (PDF): Read Download
References

1. Koncepciya pravovoy politiki Respubliki Kazahstan na period s 2010 po 2020 g. URL: adilet.zan.kz (data obrascheniya: 17.01.2017).

2. Tuyakbay Zh. A. Pravovye osnovy gosudarstvennoy politiki Respubliki Kazahstan v sfere ugolovnoy yusticii. Almaty: Zhazushy, 2004.

3. Lazareva V. A. Teoriya i praktika sudebnoy zaschity v ugolovnom processe. Samara, 2000.

4. Lyublinskiy P. I. Process kak sudebnyy poryadok i process kak pravootnoshenie // Zhurnal ministerstva yusticii. 1917. № 1. S. 263.

5. Novoe desyatiletie - novyy ekonomicheskiy pod'em - novye vozmozhnosti Kazahstana: poslanie Prezidenta Respubliki Kazahstan Nazarbaeva N. A. narodu Kazahstana // Kaz. pravda. 2010. 29 yanv.

6. Doroshkov V. V. Razlichnye ocenki principa ohrany prav i svobod cheloveka // Ohrana prav i svobod cheloveka i grazhdanina v sfere ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva: materialy Mezhdunar. nauch.-prakt. konf. M.: Mosk. akad. ekonomiki i prava: Soyuz kriminalistov i kriminologov, 2016. S. 94-100.

7. Mezhdunarodnyy pakt o grazhdanskih i politicheskih pravah. URL: un.org.ru (data obrascheniya: 17.01.2017).

8. O ratifikacii Mezhdunarodnogo pakta o grazhdanskih i politicheskih pravah: zakon Respubliki Kazahstan ot 28.11.2005 № 91-111 ZRK // Vedomosti Parlamenta Respubliki Kazahstan. 2005. № 21, 22. St. 88.

9. Azarov V. A., Tarichko I. Yu. Funkciya sudebnogo kontrolya v istorii, teorii i praktike ugolovnogo processa Rossii: monografiya. Omsk: Omsk. gos. un-t, 2004.

10. Vystuplenie Predsedatelya Konstitucionnogo Soveta Respubliki Kazahstan I. I. Rogova na konferencii «Konstitucionnaya reforma i uglublenie demokraticheskih processov v Kazahstane» 30.05.2007 v Senate Parlamenta: «Konstitucionnaya reforma - osnova dlya dal'neyshey modernizacii pravovoy sistemy». URL: www.constcouncit.kz (data obrascheniya: 17.01.2017).

11. Yakovlev V. A. Realizaciya sudebnoy vlasti na dosudebnyh stadiyah ugolovnogo processa Rossii: dis.. kand. yurid. nauk. Samara, 2001.

12. Suleymenova G. Zh. O sudebnom sankcionirovanii i otmene smertnoy kazni v zakonodatel'stvah Kazahstana i Uzbekistana // Yurist. 2007. № 9. S. 84, 85.

13. Nasyrov G. H. Ne nastupit' by na te zhe grabli // Yurist. 2007. № 9. S. 65.

14. Petruhin I. L. Teoreticheskie osnovy effektivnosti pravosudiya. M., 1979.

15. Smirnov A. V. Sostyazatel'nyy process. SPb.: Al'fa, 2001.

16. Smirnov A. V. Modeli ugolovnogo processa. SPb., 2000.

17. Mihaylovskaya I. B. Sudebnye stadii v ugolovnom processe. Sudebnaya reforma: problemy i perspektivy. M.: Prospekt, 2001.

18. Ahpanov A. N., Han A. L. O procedure sudebnogo aresta v ugolovnom processe // Sankcionirovanie aresta sudom: sovershenstvovanie zakonodatel'stva i pravoprimenitel'noy praktiki: sb. Mezhdunar. konf. Astana, 2010. S. 59-64.

19. Cokolova O. I. Primenenie organami predvaritel'nogo sledstviya i doznaniya mer processual'nogo prinuzhdeniya pod sudebnym kontrolem: avtoref. dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. M., 1995.

20. Derishev Yu. Sledstvennyy sud'ya v dosudebnom proizvodstve // Ugolovnoe pravo. 2004. № 3. S. 79, 80.

21. Smirnov A. V. Kommentariy k Ugolovno-processual'nomu kodeksu Rossiyskoy Federacii. SPb., 2003.

22. Kovtun N. N. O ponyatii i soderzhanii termina «sudebnyy sledovatel'» (sledstvennyy sud'ya) // Rossiyskiy sud'ya. 2010. № 5. S. 15-20.

23. Gucenko K. F., Golovko L. V., Filimonov B. A. Ugolovnyy process zapadnyh gosudarstv. M., 2002.

24. Golovko L. V. Novaya rol' sud'i pri proizvodstve policeyskogo rassledovaniya v ugolovnom processe postsovetskih gosudarstv // Zanger. Vestnik prava Respubliki Kazahstan. 2010. № 1 (102). S. 82, 83.

25. Petruhin I. L. Sostyazatel'nost' - osnova pravosudiya // Gosudarstvo i pravo na rubezhe vekov: materialy Vseros. konf. M., 2001.

26. Gus'kova A. P., Emel'yanov V. A., Slavgorodskih A. A. Problemnye voprosy reformirovaniya dosudebnogo proizvodstva Rossii // Rossiyskiy sud'ya. 2008. № 4. S. 9-11.

27. Doktrinal'naya model' ugolovno-processual'nogo dokazatel'stvennogo prava Rossiyskoy Federacii / A. S. Aleksandrov [i dr.]. M.: Yurlitinform, 2015.

28. Ahpanov A. N. Deponirovanie pokazaniy poterpevshego i svidetelya v ugolovnom processe Respubliki Kazahstan. URL: http://www.zakon.kz (data obrascheniya: 20.02.2017).

29. Zagorskiy G. I. Obespechenie ravenstva storon v sudebnom razbiratel'stve po ugolovnomu delu // Ohrana prav i svobod cheloveka i grazhdanina v sfere ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva: materialy Mezhdunar. nauch.-prakt. konf. M.: Mosk. akad. ekonomiki i prava: Soyuz kriminalistov i kriminologov, 2016. S. 105-112.

Login or Create
* Forgot password?