THE CONSTITUTION OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION AND CRIMINAL-LAW STANDARDS REGULATING CRIMES COMMITTED BY OFFICIALS DUE TO THEIR JOB POSITIONS
Abstract and keywords
Abstract (English):
The article focuses on the possibilities of the influence of constitutional standards on the improvement of the criminal legislation (Chapters 23 and 30 of the RF Criminal Code). The author offers to bring the terminology of the criminal law on special subjects stipulated by Clause 1 of the notes to Articles 201 and 285 of the RF Criminal Code into compliance with the RF Constitution. The author draws a conclusion that provisions of the RF Constitution enshrining rights and freedoms of individuals and legal entities don’t imply that these rights and freedoms are always subject to criminal-law protection. However, the limits of significant harm done to human rights and freedoms must be lower than the limits of the same harm done to legal interests of organizations or interests of the society or the government that are protected by law. Taking account of Article 49 of the RF Constitution the author arrives at a conclusion that criminal responsibility for mediation in bribery is impossible if the bribe is insignificant as well as criminalization of illegal enrichment is inadmissible.

Keywords:
the RF Constitution, crimes committed by officials due to their job positions, official, job interests, mediation in bribery, presumption of innocence
Text
Text (PDF): Read Download
References

1. V dal'neyshem - Konstituciya RF.

2. Pod sluzhebnymi prestupleniyami v dannoy rabote podrazumevayutsya prestupleniya, predusmotrennye stat'yami glav 23 i 30 Ugolovnogo kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federacii.

3. Obrazhiev K. V. Ugolovno-pravovoe znachenie Konstitucii Rossii // Probely v rossiyskom zakonodatel'stve. 2008. № 1.

4. Byulleten' Verhovnogo suda RF. 2009. № 12. V dal'neyshem - postanovlenie PVS RF № 19.

5. Obobschenie sudebnoy praktiki Pskovskoy oblasti po ugolovnym delam o zloupotreblenii dolzhnostnymi polnomochiyami i prevyshenii dolzhnostnyh polnomochiy (st. 285, 286 UK RF) [Elektronnyy resurs]. URL: http://oblsud.psk.sudrf.ru/modules.php?name=docum_sud&id=248 (data obrascheniya: 16.01.2014)

6. Bavsun M., Borkov V. Neispolnenie sotrudnikom organa vnutrennih del prikaza ili rasporyazheniya // Ugolovnoe pravo. 2010. № 6.

7. Shihanov V. N. Ugolovno-pravovaya harakteristika prestupleniy protiv gosudarstvennoy vlasti, interesov gosudarstvennoy sluzhby i sluzhby v organah mestnogo samoupravleniya. M., 2011.

8. Asnis A. Ya. Ugolovnaya otvetstvennost' za sluzhebnye prestupleniya v Rossii. Problemy zakonodatel'nogo zakrepleniya i pravoprimeneniya. M., 2005.

9. Tak, v spravke Lipeckogo oblastnogo suda po rezul'tatam obobscheniya sudebnoy praktiki rassmotreniya v 2006 g. ugolovnyh del o prestupleniyah, predusmotrennyh st. 285, 286, 290 UK RF ukazano: «Narushenie konstitucionnyh prav i svobod cheloveka i grazhdanina otnositsya k social'nomu vredu, kotoryy na praktike vsegda priznaetsya suschestvennym» [Elektronnyy resurs]. URL: http://octsud.lpk.sudrf.ru/modules. php? name=sud_c ommunity&id=62 (data obrascheniya: 15.09.2013).

10. Yacenko I. S. Zakreplenie i zaschita konstitucionnyh prav i svobod cheloveka i grazhdanina kak vysshey cennosti v Rossiyskoy Federacii // Nacional'nye interesy. 2010. № 4-5. [Elektronnyy resurs]. URL: http://www.ni-journal.ru/archive/4ca2193e/ni-4-5-2010/69b7d496/56dbd8b5/ (data obrascheniya: 16.09.2013).

11. Matuzov N. I. Aktual'nye problemy teorii prava // Boyko A. I. Sistema i struktura ugolovnogo prava: v 3-h t. T. II. Sistemnaya sreda ugolovnogo prava. Rostov n/D, 2007.

12. Yani P. Posrednichestvo vo vzyatochnichestve // Zakonnost'. 2011. № 9.

13. Garbatovich D. Posrednichestvo vo vzyatochnichestve: preobrazovannyy vid posobnichestva // Ugolovnoe pravo. 2011. № 5.

14. Tkachev I. Problemy realizacii ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti za posrednichestvo vo vzyatochnichestve // Ugolovnoe pravo. 2012. № 2.

15. Postanovlenie Central'nogo rayonnogo suda g. Omska ot 28 sentyabrya 2011 g. po delu № 1-78/2011 o prekraschenii ugolovnogo dela [Elektronnyy resurs]. URL: http://centralcourt.oms.sudrf.ru/modules.php ?name=bsr&op=print_text&cl=1&id=55600071111181447389531000395563 (data obrascheniya: 10.09.2013)

16. Rossiyskaya gazeta. 2013. 17 iyulya.

17. Nersesyan V. A. Ponyatie i formy viny v ugolovnom prave // Pravovedenie. 2002. № 2.

18. V dal'neyshem - Konvenciya OON protiv korrupcii.

19. Borkov V. N. Dolzhnostnye prestupleniya: kvalifikaciya, sistema i soderzhanie ugolovno-pravovyh zapretov. Omsk, 2010.

20. Bolotskiy B. S., Elisov P. P. Otvetstvennost' za nezakonnoe obogaschenie: vozmozhno li eto po rossiyskomu zakonodatel'stvu? // Nauchnyy portal MVD Rossii. 2008. № 4.

Login or Create
* Forgot password?