The article concerns the problem of human rights naturalness. Attention is focused on admissibility of natural information-logical transformations of these rights in different contexts. Study of the information status of human rights carried out by searching the admissibility of statements recognizing them as alethic statements, statements of possiblilities because the traditional philosophical and legal science shows close relationship between human rights and freedom. The attention is paid to various problems arising during while we recognize human rights as certain freedoms (opportunities). These problems allow to establish connection between norms and opportunities on the basis of the principle «there is no duty to execute impossible» as a condition of rationality of standard normative system. But the author shows impossibility to identify normative and alethetic modalities and their not reducibility to each other. This conclusion is drawn on the basis of formal and logical a discourse analysis of normative modalities. The author underlines the need to use of traditional approaches to alethetic modalities in legal researches and pointed out the deconstructiveness of loose interpretation of these modalities locates in legal science. Need of use of traditional approaches to alethetic modalities in legal researches is noted and the deconstructiveness of any interpretation of similar modalities locates in legal science. Besides, the author shows the groundlessness of identity of normative and alethetic modalities even when this identity is based on ethical equality of normative and alethetic modalities. This groundlessness is caused by special features of normative regulation area. Owing to the granted features consideration of human rights as freedom manifestations through their consideration as alethetic statements admits inexpedient.
Human rights, natural Law, human rights as opportunities, information status of human rights, naturalness of human rights, origin of human rights, human rights as alethetic modalities, measure of possible behavior, right and freedom, pointlessness of legal science, opportunity and necessity for the Law, due, obligatory and possible
1. Voevodin L. D. Yuridicheskiy status lichnosti v Rossii: ucheb. posobie. M., 1997.
2. Deklaraciya prav cheloveka i grazhdanina ot 26 avgusta 1789 goda // Konstitucii zarubezhnyh gosudarstv; sost. V. V. Maklakov. M., 1999.
3. Kechek'yan S. F. Pravootnosheniya v socialisticheskom obschestve. M., 1958.
4. Lobovikov V. O. «Iskusstvennyy intellekt», formal'naya etika i moral'no-pravovoy vybor. Sverdlovsk, 1988.
5. Lobovikov V. O. Matematicheskoe pravovedenie. Ch. 1: Estestvennoe pravo. Ekaterinburg, 1998.
6. Lobovikov V. O. Matematicheskaya logika estestvennogo prava i politicheskoy ekonomii (matematicheskaya filosofiya ekonomiki i prava). Ch. 1, 2. Ekaterinburg, 2005.
7. Lobovikov V. O. Nauchnaya ekspertiza logicheskoy formy dokazatel'stv v sudoproizvodstve ili logicheskaya podgotovka yuristov? // Vestn. gumanit. un-ta. Ser.: Pravo. 1996. № 1 (1).
8. Mal'cev G. V. Socialisticheskoe pravo i svoboda lichnosti (teoreticheskie voprosy). M., 1968.
9. Prava cheloveka: uchebnik dlya vuzov / otv. red E. A. Lukasheva. M., 2001.
10. Problemy teorii gosudarstva i prava / pod red. M. N. Marchenko. M., 2001.
11. Teoriya gosudarstva i prava: uchebnik dlya vuzov / pod red. M. M. Rassolova, V. O. Luchina, B. S. Ebzeeva. M., 2000.
12. Ebzeev B. S. Konstituciya. Demokratiya. Prava cheloveka. M., Cherkessk, 1992.
