The article is devoted to the peculiarities of the termination of the criminal case in connection with the appointment of a criminal-legal measure in the form of a judicial penalty, which was normatively fixed in the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation and the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation in 2016 due to the adoption of Federal Law No. 323-FZ. The article analyzes the legislative regulation of this innovation, notes some problems of the application of the above-mentioned measure of a criminal-legal nature, caused by insufficiently complete regulatory regulation. The author justifies the need to expand the subjects of the initiative to initiate an application for the termination of a criminal case or criminal prosecution for this reason, fixing in their criminal procedural law their right to appeal a refusal to satisfy their initiative petition. The article formulates a set of proposals aimed at eliminating identified gaps in the regulation of procedural issues in the appointment of a judicial fine.
termination of the criminal case, termination of criminal prosecution, criminal law measure, judicial penalty, Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation, exemption from criminal liability, petition, legal proceedings
1. O vnesenii izmeneniy v Ugolovnyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federacii i Ugolovno-processual'nyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federacii po voprosam sovershenstvovaniya osnovaniy i poryadka osvobozhdeniya ot ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti: feder. zakon ot 3 iyulya 2016 g. № 323-FZ // SZ RF. 2016 g. № 27 (ch. II). St. 4256.
2. O vnesenii izmeneniy v nekotorye postanovleniya Plenuma Verhovnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federacii po voprosam sovershenstvovaniya osnovaniy i poryadka osvobozhdeniya ot ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti: postanovlenie Plenuma Verhovnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federacii ot 29 noyabrya 2016 g. № 56 // Byulleten' Verhovnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federacii. 2017. № 1.
3. O primenenii sudami zakonodatel'stva, reglamentiruyuschego osnovaniya i poryadok osvobozhdeniya ot ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti: postanovlenie Plenuma Verhovnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federacii ot 27 iyunya 2013 g. № 19 (red. ot 29.11.2016). Dostup iz sprav.-pravovoy sistemy «Konsul'tantPlyus».
4. Apostolova N. N. Prekraschenie ugolovnogo dela ili ugolovnogo presledovaniya s naznacheniem mery ugolovno-pravovogo haraktera v vide sudebnogo shtrafa // Rossiyskaya yusticiya. 2016. № 10. S. 34-37.
5. Zayceva E. A., Ashurov V. K., Sidorenko O. V. Rol' sledstvennoy i sudebnoy praktiki v obespechenii pravil'nogo primeneniya norm ugolovno-processual'nogo prava: monogr. Volgograd : VA MVD Rossii, 2017. 224 s.
6. Ryzhakov A. P. Kommentariy k Federal'nomu zakonu ot 3 iyulya 2016 g. № 323-FZ «O vnesenii izmeneniy v Ugolovnyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federacii i Ugolovno-processual'nyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federacii po voprosam sovershenstvovaniya osnovaniy i poryadka osvobozhdeniya ot ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti». Dostup iz sprav.-pravovoy sistemy «Konsul'tantPlyus».
7. Shalumov M. S. Primenenie sudebnogo shtrafa: kratkiy kommentariy k raz'yasneniyam Plenuma Verhovnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federacii // Ugolovnyy process. 2017. № 2 (146). S. 24-27.
8. Schukin V. I., Curluy O. Yu. O sudebnom shtrafe kak osnovanii prekrascheniya ugolovnogo dela // Problemy pravoohranitel'noy deyatel'nosti. 2017. № 1. S. 41-47.
