This article argues that the environmental impact assessment as a function of management in the field of environmental protection is one of the most debated issues in the Russian ecological law science, having a very extensive practice. The legislator pays special attention to this procedure, securing it by several principles. After analyzing the provisions of the scientific doctrine and court practice the author comes to the conclusion that, despite a significant reduction as a result of reforms 2006-2007 the scope of environmental review (in connection with reduction of administrative barriers in construction), the environmental law Institute retains its effect, and its core continues to be the principles formulated in the Federal laws «On environmental protection» and «On ecological expertise». Given that courts often refer to the institutional principles of environmental assessment, it can be argued that they perform their function and are the core of the legal institution of environmental impact assessment.
environmental impact assessment, management, judgment, expert opinion, legal technology, legal institution, negative impact, environment, planning laws
1. O sostoyanii i ob ohrane okruzhayuschey sredy Rossiyskoy Federacii v 2015 godu: gosudarstvennyy doklad. M.: Ministerstvo prirodnyh resursov i ekologii Rossiyskoy Federacii, 2016.
2. Blazheev Ya. A. Ekologo-pravovoe regulirovanie otnosheniy v neftegazovom komplekse Rossii: dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. M., 2016.
3. Davydova M. L. Teoreticheskie i metodologicheskie problemy ponyatiya i sostava yuridicheskoy tehniki: dis. … d-ra yurid. nauk. Volgograd, 2010.
4. Revina S. N. Teoriya prava i rynok: monogr. Samara, 2008.
5. Anisimov A. P. Prezumpcii v ekologicheskom prave // Agrarnoe i zemel'noe pravo. 2013. № 2 (98). S. 4-10.
6. Apellyacionnoe opredelenie ot 14 fevralya 2012 g. po delu № 33-432 Kirovskogo oblastnogo suda. URL: https://rospravosudie.com (data obrascheniya 02.10.2017)/
7. Kommentariy k Federal'nomu zakonu «Ob ekologicheskoy ekspertize» ot 23 noyabrya 1995 g. № 174-FZ / otv. red. M. M. Brinchuk. Dostup iz sprav.-pravovoy sistemy «Konsul'tantPlyus».
8. Gogaeva M. T. Pravovoy mehanizm prinyatiya ekologicheski znachimyh resheniy: avtoref. dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. M., 2011.
9. Postanovlenie Federal'nogo arbitrazhnogo suda Volgo-Vyatskogo okruga ot 24 iyunya 2008 g. po delu № A29-425/2008. Dostup iz sprav.-pravovoy sistemy «Konsul'tantPlyus».
10. Kichigin N. V., Ponomarev M. V., Sem'yanova A. Yu. Kommentariy k Federal'nomu zakonu «Ob ekologicheskoy ekspertize» ot 23 noyabrya 1995 g. № 174-FZ (Postateynyy). Dostup iz sprav.-pravovoy sistemy «Konsul'tantPlyus».
11. Postanovlenie Federal'nogo arbitrazhnogo suda Moskovskogo okruga ot 2 sentyabrya 2008 g. № KA-A40/8118-08. Dostup iz sprav.-pravovoy sistemy «Konsul'tantPlyus».
12. Postanovlenie Arbitrazhnogo suda Povolzhskogo okruga ot 7 dekabrya 2016 g. № F06-15112/2016. Dostup iz sprav.-pravovoy sistemy «Konsul'tantPlyus».
13. Anisimov A. P. Problema usileniya roli obschestvennosti v prinyatii ekologicheski znachimyh resheniy v rossiyskom i evropeyskom prave // Evraziyskiy yuridicheskiy zhurnal. 2013. № 12 (67). S. 156-159.
14. Postanovlenie Arbitrazhnogo suda Ural'skogo okruga ot 1 iyulya 2016 g. № F09-5195/16 po delu № A76-26164/2015. Dostup iz sprav.-pravovoy sistemy «Konsul'tantPlyus».
15. Alekseeva A. P. Otvetstvennost' za ekologicheskie pravonarusheniya (prestupleniya). // Puti razvitiya rossiyskoy yuridicheskoy nauki i obrazovaniya v XXI veke: tezisy dokladov nauch.-prakt. konf. (Volgograd, 25-26 oktyabrya 2001 g.). Volgograd, 2001. S. 129-132.
16. Anisimov A. P., Alekseeva A. P., Melihov A. I. Aktual'nye problemy protivodeystviya ekologicheskoy prestupnosti v Rossii // Kriminologicheskiy zhurnal Baykal'skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta ekonomiki i prava. 2013. № 3. S. 80-89.
17. Anisimova T. V. Issledovanie sistemy cennostey podsudimogo kak sposob ob'yasneniya motivov prestupleniya // Obschestvo i chelovek. 2011. № 1 (2). S. 12-14.
18. Anisimova T. V. Naznachenie cennostnogo argumenta v sisteme sudebnoy argumentacii // Aktual'nye problemy filologii i pedagogicheskoy lingvistiki / pod red. T. Yu. Tamer'yan. 2008. № 10. S. 78-83.
