The article is devoted to the procedural regulation of preliminary examination of material traces of document forgery. There are a lot of points of view in regard to the mentioned concept. In the author’s opinion, such examination can be conducted while investigating the crime scene before a criminal case is initiated as well as be one of the grounds for initiating a criminal case (or refusing to initiate it) taking account of the obtained results. Nowadays, the conduct of forensic examination before a criminal case is initiated is permitted by law along with preliminary examination. From the author’s point of view, to establish elements of a crime it is reasonable to carry out preliminary examination while forensic examination should be conducted when preliminary examination doesn’t allow detecting traces of a crime. However, according to the current legislation of criminal procedure the results obtained by a specialist within the framework of preliminary examination can’t be used as evidence. Therefore, in order to reduce the time of inquiry it would be reasonable to make additions to the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation providing the possibility to accept the results of preliminary examination as evidence along with the expert’s report.
document, information, preliminary examination, traces, forgery, crime, specialist, expert
1. Tkach V. Yu. Mesto proisshestviya kak ob'ekt kriminalisticheskogo issledovaniya (problemy nauchno-tehnicheskogo i organizacionnogo obespecheniya): dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. Volgograd, 2016.
2. Ob utverzhdenii Nastavleniya po organizacii ekspertno-kriminalisticheskoy deyatel'nosti v sisteme MVD Rossii: prikaz MVD Rossii ot 11 yanvarya 2009 g. № 7 (s izm. ot 16.05.2016). Dostup iz spravochno-pravovoy sistemy «Konsul'tantPlyus».
3. Belkin R. S. Kurs kriminalistiki: v 3 t. T. 2: Chastnye kriminalisticheskie teorii. M., 1997.
4. Mahov V. N. Teoriya i praktika ispol'zovaniya znaniy sveduschih lic pri rassledovanii prestupleniy: dis. … d-ra yurid. nauk. M., 1993.
5. O vnesenii izmeneniy v stat'i 62 i 303 Ugolovnogo Kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federacii v Ugolovno-processual'nyy Kodeks Rossiyskoy Federacii: feder. zakon ot 4 marta 2013 g. № 23-FZ (v red. ot 28.12.2013 № 432-FZ). Dostup iz spravochno-pravovoy sistemy «Konsul'tantPlyus».
6. Gavrilov B. Ya. Ob effektivnosti ispol'zovaniya special'nyh znaniy na etape proverki soobscheniya o prestuplenii // Sudebnaya ekspertiza: rossiyskiy i mezhdunarodnyy opyt: sb. materialov II mezhdunar. nauch.-prakt. konf. (21-22 maya 2014 g.). Volgograd, 2014. S. 32-38.
7. Lazareva L. V. Proizvodstvo sudebnoy ekspertizy na stadii vozbuzhdeniya ugolovnogo dela: problemy regulirovaniya i realizacii // Sudebnaya ekspertiza. 2015. № 3 (43). C. 10-20.
8. Orlov Yu. K. Vozmozhno li proizvodstvo sudebnoy ekspertizy v stadii vozbuzhdeniya ugolovnogo dela? // Zakonnost'. 2003. № 9. C. 20-21.
9. Sadovskiy A. I. Problemy formirovaniya dokazatel'stv sledovatelem s ispol'zovaniem special'nyh poznaniy i tehnicheskih sredstv: dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. Volgograd, 2013.
10. Zayceva E. A. Reglamentaciya sudebnoy ekspertizy na stadii vozbuzhdeniya ugolovnogo dela: sovremennoe sostoyanie i puti sovershenstvovaniya // Sudebnaya ekspertiza. Volgograd, 2016. № 1 (45). C. 38-44.
11. Volynskiy V. A. Zakonomernosti i tendencii razvitiya kriminalisticheskoy tehniki (istoricheskiy, gnoseologicheskiy i social'nyy aspekty problemy): dis. … d-ra yurid. nauk. M., 2001.
12. Stepanov V. V. Predvaritel'naya proverka informacii o prestupleniyah v sfere ekonomiki // Voprosy kvalifikacii i rassledovaniya prestupleniy v sfere ekonomiki. Saratov, 1999.
13. Osnovy kriminalisticheskogo issledovaniya materialov, veschestv i izdeliy iz nih: ucheb. posobie. SPb., 2003.
14. Selivanov N. A. Veschestvennye dokazatel'stva. M., 1971.
15. Zayceva E. A. Neprocessual'naya forma ekspertnyh issledovaniy // Sudebnaya ekspertiza. Volgograd. 2011. № 4 (28). C. 16-24.
16. Zayceva E. A. Koncepciya razvitiya instituta sudebnoy ekspertizy v usloviyah sostyazatel'nogo ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva: monogr. M., 2010.
17. Zayceva E. A. K voprosu o zaklyuchenii specialista // Ugolovnoe pravo. 2006. № 4. C. 67-73.
18. O sudebnoy ekspertize po ugolovnym delam: postanovlenie Plenuma Verhovnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federacii ot 21 dekabrya 2010 g. № 28. Dostup iz spravochno-pravovoy sistemy «Konsul'tantPlyus».
19. Ob otkaze v prinyatii k rassmotreniyu zhaloby grazhdanina Astahova Pavla Vasil'evicha na narushenie ego konstitucionnyh prav ryadom polozheniy Ugolovno-processual'nogo kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federacii: opredelenie Konstitucionnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federacii ot 29 sentyabrya 2016 g. № 2032-O. Dostup iz spravochno-pravovoy sistemy «Konsul'tantPlyus».
