Russian Federation
The article is devoted to the issues of legal regulation and execution of monetary recovery as one of the measures of criminal procedural coercion. The author analyzes in detail both features of legal regulation of the specified coercive measure, and practice of application of this measure. Thus points to insufficient regulation in the criminal procedure legislation of the mechanism of implementation of the analyzed measure of procedural coercion. The main attention is given to consideration of measures of legal compulsion is similar in its nature to a monetary recovery, however, regulated in other branches of law (administrative fines, article 3.5 KoAP of the Russian Federation, a judicial fine articles 76.1, 104.4, 104.5 of the criminal code). The study of legal norms and relations related to the execution of monetary recovery, allowed to draw conclusions aimed at improving the legal regulation of the order of execution of monetary recovery. According to the author, it is advisable to Supplement the criminal procedure legislation with article 118.1 „Execution of monetary penalty“. In accordance with the provisions of this article shall be set forth the time period during which the amount of a monetary penalty must be paid. The person who paid the monetary penalty must notify the body carrying out the criminal proceedings, with the provision of supporting documents. The proposed mechanism of execution will contribute to the effective enforcement of coercive measures in the form of monetary penalties.
coercive measure, monetary collecting, execution
1. Otchet o summah uscherba ot prestupleniy, summah material'nyh vzyskaniy v dohod gosudarstva, kolichestve vynesennyh postanovleniy ob uplate processual'nyh izderzhek za schet sredstv federal'nogo byudzheta i naznachenii ekspertiz: svodnye statisticheskie svedeniya o deyatel'nosti federal'nyh sudov obschey yurisdikcii i mirovyh sudey za 2011-2016 gg., pervoe polugodie 2017 g. № 4. Razdel 2. URL: http://www.cdep.ru (data obrascheniya: 23.04.2018).
2. Bulatov B. B. Gosudarstvennoe prinuzhdenie v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve: monogr. Omsk, 2003. 320 s.
3. Kucherov I. I. Denezhnye vzyskaniya: problemy pravovoy identifikacii // Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava. 2013. № 5. S. 22-36.
4. Kal'nickiy V. V. Poryadok prekrascheniya sudom ugolovnogo dela (presledovaniya) v svyazi s naznacheniem sudebnogo shtrafa // Zakonodatel'stvo i praktika. 2016. № 2. S. 6-12.
5. Pavlov A. V. Osnovaniya, usloviya i poryadok vozbuzhdeniya pered sudom hodataystva o prekraschenii ugolovnogo dela (ugolovnogo presledovaniya) v otnoshenii podozrevaemogo (obvinyaemogo) i naznachenii mery ugolovno-pravovogo haraktera v vide sudebnogo shtrafa (kommentariy) // Zakonodatel'stvo i praktika. 2016. № 2. S. 4-6.
6. Ugolovnoe pravo. Obschaya chast': uchebnik / pod red. V. V. Veklenko. M., 2017. 405 s.
