from 01.01.2021 until now
Sochi, Krasnodar, Russian Federation
UDC 343.8
The issues of liability institute improvement in penal law are poorly dealt with. The notion of this kind of category as a separate type of legal liability is either missing or substituted for administrative, civil or disciplinary liability. Therefore, this independent branch of legal regulations of social relations has "dissoluted" in other legal relationships. This very situation in penal law is historical in nature and regarded as trivial in contemporary doctrine, not encouraging much discussion. However, it is liability that presents the central category. Its absence "blurs" the very branch of legal regulations making penal law "an appendage" for other legal spheres. Thus, criminal liability is still the subject of consideration of criminal law doctrine, namely material law branch in most cases. This situation requires scientific analysis and liability norms should be studied separately, with-in the penal theory, and taking into account, the knowledge accumulated in legal science.
liability, a form of implementation, legal relationship, legality, feasibility, compulsion
1. Kuznetsov A. A. Liability as a legal category and its impact on the development of criminal and penal law. Vestnik of Moscow University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia, 81—90, 2025. (In Russ.).
2. Lipinskiy D. A. Juridical nature of legal liability in penal law. Applied legal psychology, 133—138, 2017. (In Russ.).
3. Karpov K. N. Probation as an element of social control over persons, having committed a crime. Vestnik of the East Siberian Institute of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia, 178—187, 2023. (In Russ.).
4. Antonov T. G. Coercive measures in penal law: concept and classification. In: Penal system today: cooperation between science and practice. Proceedings of the Russian scientific and practical conference, 17—18 November 2018, Novokuznetsk. Novokuznetsk: KI of the FPS of Russia; 2018: 56—57. (In Russ.).
5. Grekov M. L. Prison institutions of Russia in the middle of 19th — in the early 20th centuries. In: Code of criminal and correctional punishments, 1845: conceptual foundations and historical significance (by the 170th anniversary of its adoption). Proceedings of the International scientific and practical conference, 2—3 October 2015, Gelendzhik. Krasnodar: the Kuban State University; 2016: 170—173. (In Russ.).
6. Kozochkin I. D. Criminal law of the USA: achievements and problems of reforming. Saint Petersburg: Legal center Press; 2007: 476. (In Russ.).
7. Golovanova N. A., Kozochkin I. D., Krylov N. Ye. Criminal legislation of foreign countries (Great Britain, the USA, France, Germany, Japan). Collection of legislative materials. Red. by I. D. Kozochkin. Moscow: Zertsalo; 2001: 352. (In Russ.).
8. Marukov A. F. Prison policy of England and Wales: historical and legal research. Abstract of dissertation of doctor of juridical sciences. Moscow; 2001: 308. (In Russ.).
9. Baranov V. M. Truthfulness of Soviet law norms. Problems of theory and practice. Saratov: Publishing House of the Saratov University; 1989: 400. (In Russ.).
10. Baranov A. M. Legality in pretrial criminal proceedings. Dissertation of doctor of juridical sciences. Omsk; 2007: 413. (In Russ.).
11. Chubrakov S. V. Problem of principles in penal law: history and modernity. Tomsk: Publishing House of the Tomsk State University; 2015: 128. (In Russ.).
12. Bavsun M. V. Expediency in criminal law. Dissertation of candidate of juridical sciences. Omsk; 2002: 186. (In Russ.).
13. Bavsun M. V., Pirozhnikov A. N. Approaches to the classification of other criminal-law measures aimed at combating crimes committed against the interests of the Russian Federation. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo Universiteta MVD Rossii, 84—93, 2024. (In Russ.).
14. Babayev M. M., Pudovochkin Yu. Ye. Features of criminal punishment in the aspect of riskological analysis. Justice, 134—150, 2022. (In Russ.).
15. Antonov A. G. Criminal-legal and penal coercion: similarities and differences. In: Legal problems of strengthening Russian statehood. Collection of articles of the Russian scientific and practical conference, 30 January — 2 February 2019, Tomsk. Tomsk: Publishing House of the Tomsk State University; 2019: 44—46. (In Russ.).
16. Chashnikov V. A., Falkina T. Yu. On the relationship between the concepts of "coercion" and "violence". Vestnik of Moscow University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia, 41—43, 2015. (In Russ.).
17. Seregina V. V. State coercion under the Soviet law. Voronezh: Publishing House of the Voronezh University; 1991: 120. (In Russ.).
18. Elkind P. S. Goals and means of their achieving in Soviet criminal procedure law. Leningrad: Publishing House of the Leningrad University; 1976: 143. (In Russ.).
19. Karpov K. N. Theoretical foundations of social control in criminal law sphere. Omsk: Omsk Academy of the Ministry of the Interior of Russia; 2025: 220. (In Russ.).
20. Tagantsev N. S. Russian criminal law. General Part. Vol. 2. Tula: Avtograf; 2001: 688. (In Russ.).
21. Remenson A. L. On the place of norms of correctional labor law in the Soviet law system. In: Problems of improving efficiency of legal regulation at the current stage. Collection of articles. Tomsk: Publishing House of the Tomsk State University; 1976: 146—154. (In Russ.).
22. Piontkovsky A. A. Selected works. Vol. 1. Kazan: the Kazan State University; 2004: 372. (In Russ.).
23. Luchinsky N. F. Fundamentals of prison service. Saint Petersburg: Editorial office of the "Prison Journal"; 1904: 180. (In Russ.).
24. Dvoretskiy M. Yu. Effectiveness of criminal liability. In: Topical problems of theory and practice of criminal law application. Collection of proceedings of the Second scientific and practical conference, 22 October 2014, Moscow. Moscow: Russian State University of Justice; 2015: 76—85. (In Russ.).
