graduate student
The article highlights the patterns of functioning and the main forensic properties of the written functional-dynamic complex of skills that are characteristic of certain types and types of foreign language writing. An opinion is expressed that the functioning of any written functional-dynamic complex, regardless of the specifics of its organization, is, in the psychophysiological aspect, a complex, self-regulating functional system of the human body. In its structure, an action program is formed, the content of which forms a mental image of the manuscript, represented, depending on the type and type of writing, by an original set of intellectual, speech, visual-motor (handwriting) elements. The main attention is paid to the formation and implementation of the hypothetical structure of the mental image of the manuscript, which is typical for pictographic, ideographic, hieroglyphic, alphabetic, mixed types of writing and their varieties. It is concluded that the structure of the functional system of writing, its originality, adaptive capabilities, establish the unity of the forensic properties of the written functional-dynamic complex, characteristic of certain types and types of writing. These include individuality, typological originality, dynamic stability, selective and temporal variability.
WRITTEN FUNCTIONAL-DYNAMIC COMPLEX OF SKILLS, FUNCTIONAL SYSTEM OF WRITING, PROGRAM OF ACTION, MENTAL IMAGE OF A MANUSCRIPT, TYPES AND TYPES OF WRITING, INDIVIDUALITY, TYPOLOGICAL ORIGINALITY, DYNAMIC STABILITY, SELECTIVE AND TEMPORAL VARIABILITY OF HANDWRITING
1. Pavlov I. P. Complete works. In 5 vols. Vol. 3. Moscow: Soviet Academy of Sci ences; 1949: 607. (In Russ.).
2. Anokhin P. K. Essays on the physiology of functional systems. Moscow: Medi cine; 1975: 447. (In Russ.).
3. Bernstein N. A. Physiology of movements and activity. Collection. In 2 parts. Ed. by O. G. Gazenko. Moscow: Nauka; 1990: 494. (In Russ.).
4. Leontiev A. A. Language, speech and speech activity. Moscow: Education; 1969: 211. (In Russ.).
5. Luria A. R. Essays on the psychophysiology of writing. Moscow: Publishing house of the Academy of Pedagogical Sciences of the RSFSR; 1950: 84. (In Russ.); Luria A. R. Fundamentals of neuropsychology. Moscow: Moscow University Press; 1973: 374. (In Russ.); Luria A. R. Basic problems of neurolinguistics. Moscow: Moscow University Press; 1975: 253. (In Russ.).
6. Orlova V. F. Proceedings of VNIISE: The theory of forensic handwriting identifi cation. Moscow: VNIISE; 1973: 335. (In Russ.).
7. Bobovkin M. V. Forensic problems of psychophysiology and pathology of the writing mechanism. Monograph. Volgograd: Volgograd Academy of the Ministry of the Interior of Russia; 2004: 392. (In Russ.).
8. Bobovkin M. V. On the system and nature of the forensic properties of hand writing. Forensic examination, 38–45, 2014. (In Russ.).
9. Samoilov G. A. Fundamentals of forensic teaching about skills. Moscow: Higher School of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the USSR; 1968: 119. (In Russ.).
10. Forensic handwriting examination. A common part. Methodological guide for experts, investigators, judges. Ed. by V. F. Orlova. Moscow: VNIISE; 1988: 125. (In Russ.).
11. Dictionary of the main terms of forensic handwriting examination. Ed. by V. F. Orlova (et al.). Moscow: RFTsSE; 2003: 84. (In Russ.).
