The article, based on the analysis of the causes and conditions of interdepartmental contradictions in the process of the emergence and development of criminalistics and forensic examination in Russia, concludes that the system of organization and legal regulation of forensic and forensic activities does not correspond to the level of technology development and the tasks of identifying, disclosing and investigating high-tech crimes; justifies the need for program-targeted support for the development and implementation of adequate methods, means and organizational and legal forms of their use in the activities of law enforcement agencies.
CRIMINALISTICS, FORENSIC ACTIVITY, FORENSIC EXAMINATION, NARROW-DEPARTMENTAL APPROACH, CONTRADICTIONS, IDEOLOGICAL CAMPAIGN, INCONCLUSIVE DISCUSSIONS, SYSTEM, SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNICAL SUPPORT, JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
1. Koldaev V. M. From the history of practical criminology in Russia. Moscow: Lex Est; 2005: 373. (In Russ.).
2. Komarinets B. M. Participation of forensic experts in conducting investigative actions on particularly dangerous crimes against the person. In: Theory and practice of forensic examination. Collection. Moscow: Legal literature Press; 1964: 6-64. (In Russ.).
3. Krylov I. F. Essays on the history of criminology and forensic examination. Leningrad: Leningrad University Press; 1975: 188. (In Russ.).
4. Volynsky A. F. To the centenary of the forensic service of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia: unexplored history lessons. Proceedings of the Academy of Management of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia, 90-100, 2019. (In Russ.).
5. Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia. Encyclopedia. Moscow: OLMA-PRESS; 2002: 623. (In Russ.).
6. Aminev F. G. Forensic expert activity in the Russian Federation: modern problems and ways of their solutions. Abstract of dissertation of doctor of juridical sciences. Rostov on Don; 2016: 53. (In Russ.).
7. Volynsky A. F. The subject of criminology and "scientific separatism": consequences and possibilities of overcoming them. Proceedings of the Academy of Management of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia, 175-185, 2018. (In Russ.).
8. Volynsky A. F. Necessity of the state system of scientific and technical support of criminal proceedings. Theory and practice of forensic examination, 130-139, 2021. (In Russ.).
9. Snezhkov V. A. Problems of increasing the efficiency of the forensic service (in the period 1984-1991). In: 85 years of the Forensic service of the internal affairs bodies. Moscow; 2004: 111-125. (In Russ.).
10. Khaziev Sh. N. Theoretical foundations of the organization of international cooperation in the field of forensic activity. Dissertation of doctor of juridical sciences. Moscow; 2016: 462. (In Russ.).
11. Lavrov V. P. Investigation of crimes in hot pursuit. Moscow: Academy of Management of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Russian Federation; 1989: 56. (In Russ.).
12. Report on the results of the interuniversity (interdepartmental) scientific research on the topic "Expert criminalistic activity and computer criminalistics". Moscow: MosU of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia named after V.Ya. Kikot: MosAk of the IC of Russia; 2021. (In Russ.).
13. Volynsky A. F., Prorvich V. A. Computer criminalistics in the system of criminal legal protection of the "traditional" and digital economy. Monograph. Moscow: Economics; 2020: 475. (In Russ.).
