The article is devoted to the poorly studied problem of principles and limits of judicial discretion in prescribing the type and measure of criminal punishment by the court. Besides, the authors focus on some complicated issues of criminal procedure guarantees of ensuring rights and legal interests of an individual using the subjective approach of the court in determining the measure of criminal punishment.
law of criminal procedure, court, discretion, juvenile, defendant, crime, punishment, fundamentals, decision, norm, limit, supervision
1. Vinarkevich I. R. Dopustimye predely sudeyskogo usmotreniya // Ekonomicheskiy labirint. Dal'nevostochnyy ekonomiko-pravovoy zhurnal. 2002. № 11. S. 47.
2. Sevast'yanov A. P. Predely sudeyskogo usmotreniya pri naznachenii nakazaniya: avtoref. dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. Krasnoyarsk, 2004. S. 3.
3. Tam zhe. S. 5.
4. Bavsun M. V. Sudebnoe usmotrenie pri naznachenii nakazaniya i problemy ego ogranicheniya // Zhurnal ros. prava. 2007. № 9. 23.
5. Zubkova V. I. Ugolovnoe nakazanie i ego social'naya rol': teoriya i praktika. M., 2006. S. 145.
6. Veliev S. A., Savenkov A. V. Individualizaciya ugolovnogo nakazaniya. M., 2005. S. 104—105.
7. Papkova O. A. Usmotrenie suda. M., 2005. S. 72.
8. Bavsun M. V. Ukaz. soch. S. 23.
9. Papkova O. A. Ukaz. soch. S. 72.
10. Barak A. Sudeyskoe usmotrenie / per. s angl. M., 1999. S. 13.
