Abstract and keywords
Abstract (English):
The authors evaluate a concise form of inquiry in the Russian Federation Code of Criminal Procedure in a critical way. They point out that in the adversarial criminal procedure that denies the objective truth its formalization is inevitable. Certain formalized procedures arise. They simplify or reduce criminal proceedings. They always require the admission of guilt by a suspect or an accused person. A new form of inquiry belongs to them as well.

Keywords:
objective-truth and adversarial criminal procedures, concise form of inquiry, formalized procedures of criminal procedure, admission of guilt by a suspect or an accused person, technical truth, objective truth
Text
Text (PDF): Read Download
References

1. Postanovlenie Konstitucionnogo suda RF ot 14 fevralya 2000 g. № 2-P // Enikeev Z. D. Voprosy ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva v resheniyah Konstitucionnogo suda Rossiyskoy Federacii / Z. D. Enikeev [i dr.]. M., 2011.

2. Mihaylovskaya I. B. Nastol'naya kniga sud'i po dokazyvaniyu v ugolovnom processe. M., 2006.

3. Azarov V. A. A udalas' li konferenciya? // Vestn. Omskogo un-ta. Ser. «Pravo». 2008. № 1(14).

4. Luneev V. V. Tendencii sovremennoy prestupnosti i bor'ba s ney v Rossii // Gos-vo i pravo. 2004. № 1.

5. Syryh V. M. Logicheskie osnovaniya obschey teorii prava. M., 2007. T. 3. Sovremennoe pravoponimanie.

6. No, kak izvestno, «deshevoe pravosudie dorogo gosudarstvu».

7. Petruhin I. Sdelki o priznanii viny chuzhdy rossiyskomu mentalitetu // Ros. yusticiya. 2001. № 5; Mihaylov P. Sdelki o priznanii viny — ne v interesah poterpevshih // Ros. yusticiya. 2001. № 5.

8. Naprimer, po resheniyu Verhovnogo Suda SShA (Noth Carolina V. Alford (400 V. S.) 25 (1970)) obvinyaemyy mozhet prinyat' sdelku o priznanii vinovnosti, chtoby izbezhat' bolee strogogo nakazaniya, dazhe esli on otricaet svoyu vinu. V etih sluchayah sud'ya dolzhen ubedit'sya v dostatochnosti ulichayuschih obvinyaemogo dokazatel'stv (Sm.: Teyman S. Sdelki o priznanii viny ili sokraschennye formy sudoproizvodstva: po kakomu puti poydet Rossiya?// Ros. yusticiya. 1998. № 10).

9. Teyman S. Sdelki o priznanii viny ili sokraschennye formy sudoproizvodstva: po kakomu puti poydet Rossiya?// Ros. yusticiya. 1998. № 10. S. 37. Kak predstavlyaetsya, «sdelka» mozhet byt' i udobnym sredstvom ukryvatel'stva prestupleniya, esli, skazhem, lico v «sdelke» beret na sebya chuzhuyu vinu. Ob otricatel'nyh posledstviyah «sdelki o priznanii viny» sm.: Feofanov Yu. Kak u nih sudyat? // Ros. yusticiya. 1995. № 4.

Login or Create
* Forgot password?