The article focuses on the possibility of instilling human rights with information of describing, facts-establishing character to settle the issues of human rights naturalness, naturalness of their origin. On the basis of difference in description and evaluation, de re and de dicto standards, prescriptive standards, and standards describing typical processes the author draws a conclusion that it is admissible for human rights to belong to describing information only when there is no possibility to mix it with standards. The article proves that it is not reasonable to associate human rights with describing information due to the impossibility of further logical connection of human rights with standards of law.
human rights, natural law, de re standards, de dicto standards, standards of description, standards of prescription, Hume’s principle, informational status of human rights, human rights naturalness, human rights origin
1. Arutyunova N. D. Yazyk i mir cheloveka. M., 1999.
2. Vol'f E. M. Funkcional'naya semantika ocenki. 2-e izd. dop. M., 2002.
3. Ivanenko G. S. Lingvisticheskaya ekspertiza v processah po zaschite chesti, dostoinstva, delovoy reputacii. Chelyabinsk, 2006.
4. Ivin A. A. Logika norm. M., 1973.
5. Ivin A. A. Osnovaniya logiki ocenok. M., 1970.
6. Lobovikov V. O. Nauchnaya ekspertiza logicheskoy formy dokazatel'stv v sudoproizvodstve ili logicheskaya podgotovka yuristov? // Vestn. Gumanit. un-ta. Ser.: Pravo. 1996. № 1(1).
7. Prava cheloveka: uchebnik dlya vuzov / otv. red. E. A. Lukasheva. M.: Norma, 2001.
