The author analyzes provisions of Parts 1.1 and 1.2 of Article 18 of the Federal Law No. 35-FZ «On counter-terrorism». According to the Federal Law No. 35-FZ, compensation for harm resulted from a terrorist attack is carried out in compliance with the procedure established by the Russian Federation legislation of civil proceedings at the expense of the individual who committed a terrorist attack as well as at the expense of his immediate relatives, relatives, and other people close to him. The author draws attention to the fact that Article 18 of the Federal Law No. 35-FZ «On counter-terrorism» refers only to the individual who committed a terrorist attack, i.e. the perpetrator of a crime, but not to the organizers and accomplices of this terrorist attack. Besides, in Article 18 of the Federal Law No. 35-FZ there is no clear list of individuals that can be brought to compensation for harm resulted from terrorist attacks. Not only immediate relatives and relatives can belong to such individuals, but also other people close to him. The Federal Law No. 35-FZ “On counter-terrorism” doesn’t clarify the content of such notions as immediate relatives, relatives, and other people close to the individual who committed a terrorist attack. The author is interested in the procedure of forfeiture of property and other values obtained as a result of terrorist activities and incomings from this property to the government revenue.
terrorism, forfeiture of property to the government revenue, counter-terrorism, proving
1. Sobranie zakonodatel'stva Rossiyskoy Federacii. 2013. № 44. St. 5641.
2. Sobranie zakonodatel'stva Rossiyskoy Federacii. 2006. № 11. St. 1146.
3. Bozhok V. A. Institut analogii v grazhdanskom i arbitrazhnom processual'nom prave: avtoref. dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. M., 2005. S. 24.
4. Tumanov D.A. Probely v grazhdanskom processual'nom prave: avtoref. dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. M., 2007. S. 24.
5. Kabel'kov S.N., Zahohov Z.Yu. Moral'nye aspekty ocenki dokazatel'stv v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve // Vestnik Volgogradskoy akademii MVD Rossii. 2010. №1. S. 68-72.
6. Aleksandrov A. S., Aleksandrova I. A., Kucheruk D. S. Prezumpciya nevinovnosti obvinyaemogo i raspredelenie bremeni dokazyvaniya // Byulleten' Mezhdunarodnoy associacii sodeystviya pravosudiyu. 2011. №1 (5). S. 6-13.
