Nowadays the attention of lawmakers and law enforcers is drawn to the problem of the improving of the activity of territorial bodies of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Russian Federation; they change approaches to assessing the quality of these activities and make attempts to respond to public opinion. At the same time departmental quality indicators of preliminary investigations only partially satisfy the needs and expectations of those people, who are involved in criminal proceedings. In this article author gives her own definition of the quality of preliminary investigations, based on thereview of existing law concepts and the general concept of quality applicable to objects of any nature, taking into account the extent to which features of investigation coincide with needs of all the participants of criminal proceedings. She describes different quality requirements of the investigation, established by law, as well as requirements of those people, who have the right to make procedural decisions (investigator, head of the investigative body, prosecutor, court), and citizens anyhow involved in criminal proceedings.
quality of the preliminary investigation, investigation of crimes, legal properties of the quality of investigations, judge, prosecutor, head of the investigative body, investigator
1. Bugera M. A. Kolichestvennye kriterii ocenki effektivnosti preduprezhdeniya sotrudnikami OVD hischeniy sredstv sotovoy svyazi // Vestnik Volgogradskoy akademii MVD Rossii. 2009. Vyp. 4 (11). S. 34-40.
2. Desyatov M. S., Lugovich S. M. Ocenka effektivnosti mezhvedomstvennogo vzaimodeystviya sub'ektov operativno-razysknoy deyatel'nosti // Vestnik Volgogradskoy akademii MVD Rossii. 2013. Vyp. 4 (27). S. 103-107.
3. Kozlovskiy A. Yu. Kriterii effektivnosti operativno-razysknyh podrazdeleniy tamozhennyh organov Rossii v usloviyah Tamozhennogo soyuza, Vsemirnoy torgovoy organizacii i formirovaniya Evraziyskogo ekonomicheskogo prostranstva // Vestnik Volgogradskoy akademii MVD Rossii. 2013. Vyp. 1 (24). S. 73-77.
4. Popov V. V. Voprosy ocenki effektivnosti deyatel'nosti policii // Vestnik Volgogradskoy akademii MVD Rossii. 2013. Vyp. 3 (26). S. 160-165.
5. Hodareva T. V. Pravovaya kul'tura kak faktor effektivnosti zaschity prav cheloveka // Vestnik Volgogradskoy akademii MVD Rossii. 2012. Vyp. 1 (20). S. 16-19.
6. Vlasov V. I. Rassledovanie prestupleniy. Problemy kachestva. Saratov: Izd-vo Saratovskogo un-ta, 1988. S. 24, 25, 34, 35.
7. Stepanov K. V. Problemy kachestva predvaritel'nogo rassledovaniya: dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. Rostov n/D, 2004. S. 5.
8. Glava MVD raskritikoval «palochnuyu sistemu» [Elektronnyy resurs]: ZAO «VZGLYaD.RU» 2009, Newmedia Stars, 21 iyunya 2012. URL: http://vz.ru/news/2012/6/21/584764.html (data obrascheniya: 20.03.2014).
9. Kvalimetriya i upravlenie kachestvom. Instrumenty upravleniya kachestvom: ucheb. posobie / B. I. Gerasimov [i dr.]. Tambov: Izd-vo Tamb. gos. tehn. un-ta, 2005. S. 3.
10. Granchenko I. O., Grivennaya E. I. Sovremennye modeli sistem kachestva vysshih uchebnyh zavedeniy // Vestnik Volgogradskoy akademii MVD Rossii. 2010. Vyp. 4 (15). S. 9-14.
11. GOST R 5079.11-2000 Statisticheskie metody. Statisticheskoe upravlenie kachestvom. Terminy i opredeleniya // Dostup iz sprav.-pravovoy sistemy «Konsul'tantPlyus».
12. Popova O. A. Ugolovno-processual'nye i organizacionno-takticheskie oshibki na stadii predvaritel'nogo sledstviya i puti ih predotvrascheniya i ustraneniya: dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. Volgograd, 2006. S. 215.
