The article considers issues of the terms of criminal proceedings. The author correlates terms with the criminal and procedural form and comes to the conclusion that the terms define the boundaries of the procedural form, because beyond the deadline criminal and procedural form is meaningless, because cease relationship occurring within the statutory period. Defines the relationship procedural form and the principle of procedural economy. The author comes to the conclusion that the procedural economy is the principle of the criminal-procedural form, designed to ensure the effectiveness of criminal proceedings. Procedural form is treated not as a purpose of the legal proceedings, but as a tool, aimed at the establishment of objective truth. Noted that procedural form consists of inner content, which are legal and external expression, in the form of requirements, established by the criminal procedure law, including the criminal procedure time. It is concluded that the expiry of the term serves as an absolute legal fact ceasing relationship. The term, being an element of the criminal procedural form, can be seen as a way of organizing legal relations arising in the process of criminal investigation.
criminal procedure, criminal and procedural form, terms of criminal proceedings, procedural economy, legal fact
1. Akatov A. A. Yuridicheskie fakty v sovetskom nasledstvennom prave: avtoref. dis. … kand. yurid. nauk., 1987. 18 s.
2. Alekseev S. S. Pravo: azbuka - teoriya - filosofiya: Opyt kompleksnogo issledovaniya. M., 1999. 712 s.
3. Anashkin O. A. Sovershenstvovanie processual'nyh srokov v dosudebnom proizvodstve: dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. Saratov, 2004. 228 s.
4. Gribanov V. N. Sroki v grazhdanskom prave. M, 1967. 179 s.
5. Gurevich M. A. Principy sovetskogo grazhdanskogo processual'nogo prava // Trudy Vsesoyuznogo yurid. zaochnogo in-ta. T. 3. M, 1965. S. 171-173.
6. Ivanova Z. D. Nekotorye voprosy teorii yuridicheskih faktov // Uchenye zapiski Kazanskogo un-ta. Kazan', 1957. T. 117. Kn. 7. S. 41-53.
7. Marks K., Engel's F. Soch. Izd. 2-e. M., 1961. T. 20. 827 s.
8. Pashkevich P. F. Processual'nyy zakon i effektivnost' ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva. M., 1984. 57 s.
9. Petrova G. B. Sroki kak element pravovogo regulirovaniya: dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. Saratov, 2004. 219 s.
10. Porubov N. I. Nauchnaya organizaciya truda sledovatelya. Minsk, 1970. 200 s.
11. Serebrova S. N. Osnovy racionalizacii ugolovnogo processa. N. Novgorod, 2002. 159 s.
12. Suhanov E. A. O meste srokov v sisteme yuridicheskih faktov sovetskogo grazhdanskogo prava // Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya: Pravo. 1970. № 6. S. 70-74.
13. Ugolovnyy process Rossii: ucheb. posobie / pod red. Z. F. Kovrigina, N. P. Kuznecovoy. Voronezh, 2003. 453 s.
14. Holodenko V. D. Usloviya prinyatiya resheniy i proizvodstva deystviy kak element ugolovno-processual'noy formy // Vestnik SGAP. 2000. № 2. S. 7-11.
15. Chernova S. S. Bolezn' kak yuridicheskiy fakt v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve: avtoref. dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. Tyumen', 2009. 21 s.
16. Pechnikov G. A., Posnik V. S. O koncepcii prioriteta processual'noy formy nad istinoy i garantii prav lichnosti v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve // Vestnik Volgogradskoy akademii MVD Rossii. 2011. № 2 (17). S. 115-119.
