In scientific literature and practical activities reaction of the state and society to a mercenary type of crimes is terminologically designated ambiguously. Though the property acts not only a basis of the economic relations in society, but also object of special protection. Crimes against property have essential destructive impact on activity of society, on safety of the state, violate basic rights and freedoms of his citizens, causing social injustice and intensity in society. The domestic system of criminal and legal and criminological safety only partially controls dynamics of crimes for profit against property, but poorly interferes with emergence and change of sources of criminal danger. In contents of modern programs of the prevention of crimes wider purposes and tasks that excludes possibility of allocation of special subjects of the planned activity and the organization of controlled monitoring of the decisions made in this sphere are initially put. In article the complex of topical issues of realization of system measures of protection in the mechanism of the prevention of mercenary crime in Russia is investigated.
mercenary type of crimes, system of measures of protection, prevention mechanism, sobstvennost', pravo sobstvennosti, zaschita ot korystnyh prestupleniy protiv sobstvennosti, preduprezhdenie prestupnosti
1. Sostoyanie prestupnosti za yanvar'-iyun' 2014 g. [Elektronnyy resurs] // MVD Rossii: sayt. URL: http://mvd.ru/Deljatelnost/statistics/reports/item/2351618 (data obrascheniya: 20.09.2014).
2. Kriminologiya: uchebnik / pod red. V. N. Kudryavceva i V. E. Eminova. 2-e izd., pererab. i dop. M., 1999.
3. Denisov A. I. Hischeniya i ih posledstviya. Rostov n/D, 1998.
4. Kulik V. B. Obschestvenno opasnye posledstviya hischeniya chuzhogo imuschestva: avtoref. dis. kand. yurid. nauk. M., 1999.
5. Alekseeva A. P. Dorozhnaya karta dal'neyshego reformirovaniya organov vnutrennih del Rossiyskoy Federacii (kadrovyy professionalizm, otkrytost' dlya doveriya i optimizaciya): problemy i perspektivy realizacii // Yuridicheskaya nauka i pravoohranitel'naya praktika. 2012. № 4 (22). S. 16-20.
6. Gotchina L. V. Nekotorye ocenki ponyatiynogo apparata proekta federal'nogo zakona «Ob osnovah sistemy profilaktiki pravonarusheniy v Rossiyskoy Federacii» // Vestnik Volgogradskoy akademii MVD Rossii. 2014. № 3 (30). S. 58-63.
7. Tyumencev A. N. Ob osobennostyah vzaimodeystviya sovremennoy rossiyskoy policii s naseleniem i sredstvami massovoy informacii // Vestnik Volgogradskoy akademii MVD Rossii. 2014. № 3 (30). S. 143-150.
8. Zheludkov M. A. Soderzhanie definiciy «sobstvennost'», «pravo sobstvennosti» i «imuschestvo» v aspekte vyyavleniya ob'ekta zaschity ot korystnyh prestupleniy protiv sobstvennosti // Sovremennoe pravo. 2010. № 11. S. 62-65.
9. Gorshenkov G. N. Prestuplenie: kriminologicheskoe ponyatie // Problemy prestupnosti: tradicionnye i netradicionnye podhody. M., 2003.
10. Kriminologiya: uchebnik dlya studentov vuzov, obuchayuschihsya po special'nosti 021100 «Yurisprudenciya» / G. A. Avanesov, S. M. Inshakov [i dr.] / pod red. G. A. Avanesova. 3-e izd., pererab. i dop. M., 2005.
