The article focuses on the means of crime victim compensation, which are enumerated in the current criminal procedure legislation of the Russian Federation. They are as follows: a civil action, restitution, voluntary compensation for harm caused by the crime. The author analyses disadvantages of all the means mentioned above. The article reviews and analyzes legislative innovations in crime victim compensation area, in security for a civil action, such as imposition of arrest on the property of a suspect, of an accused or of other people, responsible for their criminal misconduct. On the basis of statistics and investigative practice the author looks on the law enforcement problems in the area under study. The researcher brings up the questions of comparing public and discretionary nature in the criminal procedure of Russia. The focus is also given to the compliance of the purposes of punishment and the settlement of a criminal case on the merits. The article looks at the appropriacy of imposing a burden of proving the quantum of damages caused by the crime on the victim in the modern constitutional and social state.
indemnification, compensation, harm, damage, non-pecuniary damage, pecuniary injury, an injured party, a victim, restitution, a civil action, voluntary compensation for harm, legal consciousness, security for a civil action, imposition of arrest on property, social justice restoration, criminal prosecution, the quantum of damages, outlining the evidence of plaintiff's claims, nature and extent of damage, burden of proving, liability, publicity, physical evidence, circumstances in proof, termination of criminal case, conciliation of parties, victim's declaration of intent, plaintiff's claims, expiation for the harm, defence, restoration, settlement of criminal case
1. Problemy zaschity prav poterpevshih ot prestupleniy. Special'nyy doklad Upolnomochennogo po pravam cheloveka v rossiyskoy Federacii V. Lukina // Ros. gaz. 2008. 4 iyunya.
2. Kriminologicheskaya obstanovka v Rossiyskoy Federacii v 2006 godu i prognoz ee razvitiya. M., 2007.
3. Dannaya informaciya poluchena na sayte https://mvd.ru/ (data obrascheniya: 06.12.2014). Dannye okrugleny avtorom v storonu umen'sheniya.
4. Foynickiy I. Ya. Uchenie o nakazanii v svyazi s tyur'movedeniem. SPb., 1988.
5. O poterpevshih ot prestupleniy: proekt feder. zakona [Elektronnyy resurs]. URL: http://www.rg.ru/2012 /02/24/poterpevshie-site-dok.html (data obrascheniya 12.09.2014).
6. Dannaya informaciya poluchena na saytah http://www.cdep.ru (data obrascheniya 06.12.2014); URL: http://www.fssprus.ru (data obrascheniya: 06.12.2014).
7. Ugolovnoe delo № 1-99/2013. Arhiv Tutaevskogo gorodskogo suda Yaroslavskoy oblasti.
8. Sinenko S. A. Obespechenie prav i zakonnyh interesov poterpevshego v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve: teoreticheskie, zakonodatel'nye i pravoprimenitel'nye problemy: dis. … d-ra yurid. nauk. M., 2014.
9. Pechnikov G. A., Volkolupov V. G., Bulhumova O. V. O znachenii grazhdanskogo iska v sostyazatel'nom UPK RF // Vestnik Volgogradskoy akademii MVD Rossii. 2011. № 3 (18).
10. Pechnikov G. A., Bulhumova O. V., Smirnova E. V. Protivopolozhnost' grazhdanskogo i reabilitacionnogo iskov v UPK RF kak otrazhenie ego sostyazatel'noy suschnosti // Vestnik Volgogradskoy akademii MVD Rossii. 2012. №2 (21).
11. Buldygina N. I. Obespechenie poterpevshemu vozmescheniya imuschestvennogo i kompensacii moral'nogo vreda, prichinennogo prestupleniem // Aktual'nye problemy obespecheniya prav lichnosti v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve: sb. nauch. st., posvyasch. pamyati prof. V. A. Poznanskogo. Saratov, 2010.
12. Titova V. N. Problemy realizacii norm ugolovno-processual'nogo zakonodatel'stva o vozmeschenii uscherba, prichinennogo prestupleniem. M., 2013.
13. Kozhin I. G. Ugolovno-processual'nyy mehanizm obespecheniya vozmescheniya vreda fizicheskomu licu: dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. Tyumen', 2006.
14. Bozh'ev V. P. Ugolovno-processual'nye pravootnosheniya. M., 1975.
15. Ugolovnoe delo №1-9/2013. Arhiv Tutaevskogo gorodskogo suda Yaroslavskoy oblasti.
16. Ugolovnoe delo №1-12/2013. Arhiv Tutaevskogo gorodskogo suda Yaroslavskoy oblasti.
17. Vinnickiy L. V., Nagulyak M. V. Garantii soblyudeniya prav poterpevshih pri prekraschenii ugolovnogo dela v svyazi s primireniem storon // Aktual'nye problemy ugolovnogo processa i kriminalistiki: materialy IV Mezhdunar. nauch.-prakt. internet-konf. (Rossiya, Volgograd, 23 maya 2013 g.). Volgograd, 2013.
18. Konvenciya OON protiv transnacional'noy organizovannoy prestupnosti // SZ RF. 2004. № 40. St. 3882; Standartnye minimal'nye pravila Organizacii Ob'edinennyh Naciy v otnoshenii mer, ne svyazannyh s tyuremnym zaklyucheniem (Tokiyskie pravila) // Mezhdunarodnye akty o pravah cheloveka: sb. dokumentov. M., 1998;
19. O kompensacii poterpevshim ot prestupleniya: rezolyuciya № (77)27 Komiteta Ministrov Soveta Evropy ot 28 sentyabrya 1977 g.;
20. Ob osnovnyh principah pravosudiya dlya zhertv prestupleniy i zloupotrebleniy vlast'yu: deklaraciya OON ot 29 noyabrya 1985 g. Dokument OON A/RES/40/34. 29 november 1985.
