The author deals with criminal procedure as an indispensable criminal law usage, describes the appliance of the Criminal Code regulations in acts of prejudicial procedure. Inquiry institution in a cut form as a direction of procedural form differentiation in criminal law application is also examined in the article. The author estimates positively an opportunity of a compromise clause on a stage of prejudicial procedure, which is reflected in resignation of real circumstantial examination and are necessary for criminal procedure definition. It is possible in such case when a suspect can agree with the investigator’s legal estimate. Disadvantages concerning to the “cut” inquiry circumstances and impossibility of crime definition in a “cut” form are given here. The absence of necessary procedural guaranties of both suspects and victims and state agencies is mentioned in the article. One can find the results of an interview of investigators, procurators and judges. Amendments for procedural form optimization in criminal law application are described there.
inquiry in a cut form, criminal law application, legal estimate of a criminal act, procedural form, optimization
1. Viktorskiy S. I. Russkiy ugolovnyy process. M., 1911.
2. Foynickiy I. Ya. Kurs ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva. SPb., 1996. T. 1.
3. Polyanskiy N. N. Voprosy teorii sovetskogo ugolovnogo processa. M., 1956.
4. Motovilovker Ya. O. Predmet sovetskogo ugolovnogo processa. Yaroslavl', 1974.
5. Gulyaev A. P. Celi, zadachi i principy kak fundamental'nye polozheniya ugolovno-processual'nogo prava: po zakonu, teorii i praktike // Ros. sledovatel'. 2012. № 16.
6. Yakimovich Yu. K. O vozmozhnosti dostizheniya ob'ektivnoy istiny v sovremennom ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve // Ugolovnaya yusticiya. 2014. № 1.
7. Kudryavcev V. N. Obschaya teoriya kvalifikacii prestupleniy. 2-e izd., pererab. i dop. M., 2004.
8. Lupinskaya P. A. Resheniya v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve. Ih vidy, soderzhanie i formy. M, 1976.
9. Gorkina E. V., Pohlebaev I. V. Institut sokraschennogo doznaniya - novaya forma uproschennogo proizvodstva v rossiyskom ugolovnom processe // Vestnik Volgogradskoy akademii MVD Rossii. 2013. № 4.
10. Murav'ev K. Obstoyatel'stva, prepyatstvuyuschie proizvodstvu doznaniya v sokraschennoy forme, kak osnovanie dlya otkaza v udovletvorenii hodataystva podozrevaemogo // Ugolovnoe pravo. 2014. № 6.
11. Pechnikov G. A., Shinkaruk V. M. Sokraschennaya forma doznaniya i ob'ektivnaya istina // Vestnik Volgogradskoy akademii MVD Rossii. 2013. № 3.
12. Kal'nickiy V. V., Murav'ev K. V., Voronov D. A. Rasprostranit' ideyu kompromissa osobogo poryadka sudebnogo razbiratel'stva na predvaritel'noe rassledovanie // Ros. sledovatel'. 2013. № 7.
13. V hode issledovaniya nami proanketirovano 280 sotrudnikov podrazdeleniy doznaniya, 96 sotrudnikov prokuratury i 50 sudey na territorii Respubliki Mordoviya, Kemerovskoy, Novosibirskoy, Omskoy, Sverdlovskoy, Tomskoy i Chelyabinskoy oblastey, a takzhe Evreyskoy avtonomnoy oblasti.
14. Kal'nickiy V., Murav'ev K., Voronov D. Koncepciya doznaniya v sokraschennoy forme: dostizheniya i voprosy sovershenstvovaniya // Ugolovnoe pravo. 2013. № 3.
15. Dikarev I. S. Doznanie v sokraschennoy forme: zamysel zakonodatelya i prakticheskiy rezul'tat // Doznanie v sokraschennoy forme: voprosy zakonodatel'noy reglamentacii i problemy pravoprimeneniya. Volgograd, 2013.
16. Po delu o proverke konstitucionnosti polozheniy ch. 1 st. 237 UPK RF v svyazi zhaloboy grazhdanina Respubliki Uzbekistan B. T. Gadaeva i zaprosom Kurganskogo oblastnogo suda [Elektronnyy resurs]: postanovlenie Konstitucionnogo suda RF ot 2 iyulya 2013 g. № 16-P. Dostup iz sprav.-pravovoy sistemy «Konsul'tantPlyus».
