The article analyzes various approaches to defining the notion «interaction», studies the content of interaction between entities of public administration and distinguishes between its types. The author suggests that interaction of the given entities can be of the following character: subordination, coordination, cooperation and reordination. The most common type is interaction in subordinate order which implies the system of interrelations established on a hierarchical principle, subordination of entities of administrative relations. The interaction which has coordinating character combines equality of interacting entities in the process of making decisions and existence of a coordinating center having specific powers of authority. In cooperative interaction a coordinating center doesn’t exist. Entities of such interaction are fully separate and independent, at the same time their activity aims at solving one or several similar tasks stipulated by normative acts. Reordination is one of interaction types which implies arrangement in a vertical, bottom-up order. In the broadest sense reordination implies application of citizens’ constitutional rights to participate in public administration process.
interaction, subordination, coordination, cooperation, reordination, entities of public administration, vzaimodeystvie, subordinaciya, koordinaciya, kooperaciya, reordinaciya, sub'ekty gosudarstvennogo upravleniya
1. Popov V. V. Problemy teorii prav cheloveka: informacionnaya teoriya prav cheloveka // Vestnik Volgogradskoy akademii MVD Rossii. 2014. № 1 (28).
2. Mescheryakov A. N. Pravovoe regulirovanie i problemy ocenki effektivnosti deyatel'nosti vysshih dolzhnostnyh lic sub'ektov Rossiyskoy Federacii // Vestnik Volgogradskoy akademii MVD Rossii. 2014. № 3 (30).
3. Ozhegov S. I. Slovar' russkogo yazyka / pod red. N. Yu. Shvedovoy. M., 1987.
4. Filosofskiy enciklopedicheskiy slovar' / pod red. L. F. Il'icheva, P. N. Fedoseeva, S. M. Kovaleva. M., 1983.
5. Tomin V. T. Problemy optimizacii sfery funkcionirovaniya organov vnutrennih del. Gor'kiy, 1978.
6. Kuznecov A. P., Scherbakov V. F. Vzaimodeystvie pravoohranitel'nyh i kontroliruyuschih organov pri protivodeystvii ekonomicheskoy prestupnosti: teoretiko-prikladnoy aspekt: monogr. N. Novgorod, 2007.
7. Kovalenko A. P., Loginova N. G., Nikolaeva N. M. Vzaimodeystvie pri raskrytii i rassledovanii prestupleniy: ucheb. posobie. M., 2010.
8. Zimin O. V., Bystrova Yu. V. Vzaimodeystvie sub'ektov preduprezhdeniya legalizacii (otmyvaniya) denezhnyh sredstv ili inogo imuschestva, priobretennyh prestupnym putem // Nauchnyy portal MVD Rossii. 2009. № 4 (8).
9. Zaparenko A. M. Koordinaciya deyatel'nosti organov predvaritel'nogo sledstviya kak sostavnaya chast' processa organizacii rassledovaniya prestupleniy // Ros. sledovatel'. 2010. № 19.
10. O prokurature Rossiyskoy Federacii: feder. zakon ot 17.01.1992 № 2202-1 (red. ot 21.11.2011) // Dostup iz sprav.-pravovoy sistemy «Konsul'tantPlyus».
11. O koordinacii deyatel'nosti pravoohranitel'nyh organov po bor'be s prestupnost'yu (vmeste s «Polozheniem o koordinacii deyatel'nosti pravoohranitel'nyh organov po bor'be s prestupnost'yu»): ukaz Prezidenta RF ot 18.04.1996 № 567 (red. ot 25.11.2003) // Dostup iz sprav.-pravovoy sistemy «Konsul'tantPlyus».
12. Maksurov A. A., Makarov I. I. Koordinaciya v prave: monogr. Yaroslavl', 2012.
13. Alekseev A. P., Mel'nikov V. A. Osnovy gosudarstvennogo i municipal'nogo upravleniya v Rossiyskoy Federacii: ucheb. posobie. Volgograd, 2012.
14. Yacenko N. E. Tolkovyy slovar' obschestvovedcheskih terminov. M., 1999.
