Surrender as option of positive post-criminal behavior in reality can happen depending on a situation at various stages of criminal proceedings. The statement for surrender made by the suspect after his detention when competent officials of law enforcement agencies, having learned about the preparing crime overtook it in time or directly after commission of crime: isn't surrender in that sense which is put in this concept of the current legislation; doesn't attract the corresponding legal consequences (mitigation of punishment, release from criminal liability); it can't be made out by law enforcement officers according to the Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation by rules of surrender. Respectively, the investigator or the investigator in such cases is obliged to refrain from use of inadequate procedural forms. In a case when the investigator himself suggests to write in such situation "surrender" for the purpose of obtaining "confession", its actions can be qualified as abuse of authority.
criminal trial, criminal case, surrender, initiation of legal proceedings, charge, bribe, measure of restraint, bases of detention, investigator, investigator, court, witness, charge
1. Biryukov A. V. Suschnost', processual'nye formy i pravovye posledstviya yavki s povinnoy: dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. M., 2000. S. 63, 64, 95.
2. Kak vyshe uzhe bylo otmecheno, Instrukciya o poryadke priema, registracii i razresheniya v territorial'nyh organah Ministerstva vnutrennih del Rossiyskoy Federacii zayavleniy i soobscheniy o prestupleniyah, ob administrativnyh pravonarusheniyah, o proisshestviyah, utverzhdennaya prikazom MVD Rossii ot 29.08.2014 № 736 (Ros. gaz. 2014. 14 noyab.), predusmatrivaet, chto ustnoe soobschenie o ranee nezaregistrirovannom prestuplenii, sdelannoe pri proizvodstve sledstvennogo deystviya, na osnovanii ch. 4 st. 141 UPK vnositsya v protokol sledstvennogo deystviya i odnovremenno oformlyaetsya raportom sotrudnika organov vnutrennih del ob obnaruzhenii priznakov prestupleniya libo protokolom prinyatiya ustnogo zayavleniya o prestuplenii (p. 18).
3. V period opisyvaemyh sobytiy konkretnoy prakticheskoy situacii deystvovali v celom analogichnye normy Administrativnogo reglamenta Ministerstva vnutrennih del Rossiyskoy Federacii predostavleniya gosudarstvennoy uslugi po priemu, registracii i razresheniyu v territorial'nyh organah Ministerstva vnutrennih del Rossiyskoy Federacii zayavleniy, soobscheniy i inoy informacii o prestupleniyah, ob administrativnyh pravonarusheniyah, o proisshestviyah, utverzhdennogo prikazom MVD Rossii ot 1 marta 2012 g. № 140 (p. 16, 63 Administrativnogo reglamenta), kotorye upomyanutym vyshe prikazom MVD Rossii ot 29 avgusta 2014 g. № 736 byli priznany utrativshimi silu.
4. O sudebnoy praktike po delam o prestupleniyah, svyazannyh s narkoticheskimi sredstvami, psihotropnymi, sil'nodeystvuyuschimi i yadovitymi veschestvami: postanovlenie Plenuma Verhovnogo suda Rossiyskoy Federacii ot 27 maya 1998 g. // Byulleten' Verhovnogo suda RF. 1998. № 7.
5. Grigor'ev V. N. Raz'yasneniya Plenuma Verhovnogo suda Rossiyskoy Federacii vyzyvayut kriticheskie zamechaniya // Mezhdunarodnyy seminar, posvyaschennyy 10-letiyu Samarskogo municipal'nogo universiteta Nayanovoy. Gumanitarnye sekcii: tezisy dokl. Samara, 1998. S. 63¾65; Grigor'ev V. N. Pravovye formy iz'yatiya ognestrel'nogo oruzhiya i boepripasov // Problemy bor'by s nezakonnym oborotom oruzhiya, boepripasov, vzryvchatyh veschestv i ih ispol'zovaniem v prestupnyh celyah: materialy nauch.-prakt. konf. M.; Tula, 2000.
6. Sobranie zakonodatel'stva RF. 2003. № 50. St. 4848.
7. Byulleten' Verhovnogo suda RF. 2006. № 8.
8. O vnesenii izmeneniy v postanovlenie Plenuma Verhovnogo suda Rossiyskoy Federacii ot 12 marta 2002 g. № 5 «O sudebnoy praktike po delam o hischenii, vymogatel'stve i nezakonnom oborote oruzhiya, boepripasov, vzryvchatyh veschestv i vzryvnyh ustroystv»: postanovlenie Plenuma Verhovnogo suda Rossiyskoy Federacii ot 3 dekabrya 2013 g. № 34 // Byulleten' Verhovnogo suda RF. 2014. № 2.
