The article covers current tendencies of lawmaking process as the major stage of legal system formation, as well as the problem of law quality offering measures for its improvement. Contemporary Russian lawmaking process shows certain tendencies that influence the quality of the law including the increasing numbers of legal acts being currently adopted, the rate of their adoption, endless updates of the earlier adopted legal acts through additions or changes, and new editions of both separate articles and legal acts as a whole. Another tendency in lawmaking is about prevailing of prohibition and limitation over stimulation and permission. It should be stated that there is actually no mechanism for including new legal acts into the system of Russian legislation, which does not seem to be consistent as whole. Negative tendencies of its development lead to depreciation of law as a concept, disrespect towards the legal norms,which begin to be ignored in many ways. In order to correct the current situation a certain strategy of lawmaking should be developed aimed at humanization of the legal system, especially the legal acts that balance private and public interests.
lawmaking process, legislation, law, constitutional values, lawmaking principles
1. Tihomirov Yu. A. O modernizacii gosudarstva // Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava. 2004. № 4.
2. Pridvorov N. A., Trofimov V. V. Pravoobrazovanie i pravoobrazuyuschie faktory v prave: monogr. M., 2012.
3. Aranovskiy K. V. Konstitucionnaya tradiciya v rossiyskoy srede. SPb., 2003.
4. Vetyutnev Yu. Yu. Aksiologiya pravovoy formy. M., 2013.
5. Kovler A. I. Antropologiya prava: uchebnik. M., 2002.
6. Luchin V. O. Konstituciya Rossiyskoy Federacii. Problemy realizacii. M., 2002.
7. Gubaeva T. V. Yazyk i pravo. Iskusstvo vladeniya slovom v professional'noy yuridicheskoy deyatel'nosti. M., 2004.
8. Kruss V. I. Zakonodatel'nye oshibki v kontekste principa pryamogo deystviya Konstitucii Rossiyskoy Federacii // Pravotvorcheskie oshibki: ponyatie, vidy, praktika i tehnika ustraneniya v postsovetskih gosudarstvah: materialy mezhdunar. nauch.-prakt. kruglogo stola (29-30 maya 2008 g.) / pod red. V. M. Baranova, I. M. Mackevicha. M., 2009.
9. Tolstik V. A. Pravovoy totalitarizm: strategiya pravotvorchestva ili dvizhenie po inercii? // Yuridicheskaya tehnika. Strategiya, taktika, tehnika zakonotvorchestva (vzaimosvyaz', innovacionnye dostizheniya, oshibki). Ezhegodnik. 2015. № 9.
10. Isaev I. A. Normativnost' i avtoritarnost'. Peresechenie idey: monogr. M., 2014.
11. Makareyko N. V. Gosudarstvennoe prinuzhdenie kak sredstvo kompromissa // Kompromiss v prave: teoriya, praktika, tehnika: sb. st. po materialam mezhdunar. nauch.-prakt. konf. (g. N. Novgorod, 29-30 maya 2014 g.): v 2 t. / pod obsch. red. V. A. Tolstika, V. M. Baranova, A. V. Parfenova. N. Novgorod, 2014. T. 2.
12. O vnesenii izmeneniy v Kodeks Rossiyskoy Federacii ob administrativnyh pravonarusheniyah v chasti sovershenstvovaniya vzyskaniya shtrafov za administrativnye pravonarusheniya v oblasti dorozhnogo dvizheniya: feder. zakon ot 22 dekabrya 2014 g. № 437-FZ // SZ RF. 2014. № 52 (ch. I). St. 7548.
13. Syryh V. M. Logicheskie osnovaniya obschey teorii prava. T. 3: Sovremennoe pravoponimanie. M., 2007.
14. Vetyutnev Yu. Yu. Cennostnye aspekty pravovogo kompromissa // Kompromiss v prave: teoriya, praktika, tehnika: sb. st. po materialam mezhdunar. nauch.-prakt. konf. (g. N. Novgorod, 29-30 maya 2014 g.): v 2 t. / pod obsch. red. V. A. Tolstika, V. M. Baranova, A. V. Parfenova. N. Novgorod, 2014. T. 1.
15. Morozova L. A. Balans publichnyh i chastnyh interesov kak sredstvo dostizheniya kompromissa v prave // Kompromiss v prave: teoriya, praktika, tehnika: sb. st. po materialam mezhdunar. nauch.-prakt. konf. (g. N. Novgorod, 29-30 maya 2014 g.): v 2 t. / pod obsch. red. V. A. Tolstika, V. M. Baranova, A. V. Parfenova. N. Novgorod, 2014. T. 2.
