It has to be certainly admitted that the Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation fairly effectively administers the application of coercion to the participants of criminal procedural relations. For instance Section IV «Procedural coercive measures» has a complete list of coercive and restrictive measures, as well as their grounds and application conditions. The norms of the section clearly show hypothesis, disposition and sanction. However, having stated the existence of coercive norms, it should not go unmentioned that there is a group of norms that commands certain positive outcomes for participants of criminal proceedings, thus they can be viewed as incentive. Humanistic principles of criminal proceeding are clearly demonstrated when criminal cases are dismissed due to non-rehabilitative grounds which do not exclude further proceedings on the case. It is submitted that incentive norms of Russian criminal procedural legislation should qualify the demands defined by the general theory of law. That is why the legislator should pay attention to the systematization of norms with incentive terms. To solve this problem, one should define the list of incentive measures, participants to whom they may be addressed and administer the procedure of application.
incentive measures of criminal procedural legislation, witness immunity, dismissal of criminal case on non-rehabilitative grounds
1. Pechnikov G. A., Blinkov A. P., Volkolupov V. G. Ob'ektivno-istinnyy i sostyazatel'nyy ugolovnyy process // Vestnik Volgogradskoy akademii MVD Rossii. 2013. № 1.
2. Alekseev S. S. Obschaya teoriya prava: v 2 t. M., 1982. T. 2.
3. Strogovich M. S. Kurs sovetskogo ugolovnogo processa. M., 1968. T. 1: Osnovnye polozheniya nauki sovetskogo ugolovnogo processa.
4. Dikarev I. S. Dispozitivnost' v ugolovnom processe Rossii / pod red. prof. A. P. Kruglikova. Volgograd, 2005.
5. Rusman G. S. Processual'nyy harakter pooschritel'nyh pravootnosheniy v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve: postanovka problemy // Vestnik Yuzhno-Ural'skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2011. Vyp. 28. S. 75-79.
6. Lange N. I. Issledovanie ob ugolovnom prave Russkoy Pravdy. SPb., 1860.
7. Zhizhilenko A. A. Zadachi tekuschego momenta v oblasti russkogo ugolovnogo zakonodatel'stva // Otchet o sostoyanii i deyatel'nosti imperatorskogo Petrogradskogo universiteta za 1915 god. Pg., 1916.
8. Sorokin P. A. Prestuplenie i kara, podvig i nagrada. Sociologicheskiy etyud ob osnovnyh formah obschestvennogo povedeniya i morali. SPb., 1914.
9. Golovko L. V. Sovremennaya praktika osvobozhdeniya ot ugolovnogo presledovaniya v Shotlandii // Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 11. Pravo. 1998. № 2. S. 74.
10. Baranov V. M. Pooschritel'nye normy sovetskogo socialisticheskogo prava / pod red. M. I. Baytina. Saratov, 1978.
11. Men'shih A. A. O vozmeschenii uscherba zhertvam prestupleniy vo Francii // Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava. 1999. № 3/4. S. 165.
12. Donald J. Newman. Conviction: The Determination of Guilt or Innocence Without Trial. Little Brown, 1966.
13. Alekseeva A. P. Deyatel'nost' rossiyskoy policii v ocenkah obschestvennosti // Vestnik Volgogradskoy akademii MVD Rossii. 2011. № 4. S. 26-33.
14. Alekseeva A. P. Dorozhnaya karta dal'neyshego reformirovaniya organov vnutrennih del Rossiyskoy Federacii (kadrovyy professionalizm, otkrytost' dlya doveriya i optimizaciya): problemy i perspektivy realizacii // Yuridicheskaya nauka i pravoohranitel'naya praktika. 2012. № 4. S. 16-20.
15. Ashurov V. K. Primenenie norm ugolovno-processual'nogo prava: teoreticheskie aspekty // Vestnik Volgogradskoy akademii MVD Rossii. 2013. № 4. S. 81-86.
16. Shmatov M. A., Balkonskiy A. G., Dmitrienko S. A. Sudebnyy kontrol' v processe dosudebnogo soglasheniya o sotrudnichestve // Vestnik Volgogradskoy akademii MVD Rossii. 2012. № 1. S. 186-190.
17. Reshetnikov V. M., Egorova N. A. Naglyadnost' v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve (ugolovno-processual'nyy i kriminalisticheskiy aspekty) // Vestnik Volgogradskoy akademii MVD Rossii. 2012. № 2.
18. Baranov V. M. Pooschritel'nye normy sovetskogo socialisticheskogo prava / pod red. M. I. Baytina. Saratov, 1978.
19. Kruglikov A. P. Mnogochislennye izmeneniya i dopolneniya v UPK RF vyzyvayut neobhodimost' podgotovki i prinyatiya novoy ego redakcii // Pravo i ego realizaciya v XXI veke: sb. nauch. tr. po mater. mezhdunar. nauch.-prakt. konf., posvyasch. 80-letiyu Sarat. gos. yurid. akademii, Saratov, 29-30 sentyabrya 2011 g.): v 2 ch. Saratov, 2011. Ch. 1.
