The article studies the problems of usage of technical means in criminal prоcedure. Having analyzed the absence of the notion of technical means in Russian Criminal Procedural Code and the notion’s fragmentary nature in the Code’s regulations the author acknowledges the necessity of their uniformity in legal regulations. The article analyzes Russian and foreign legislation on the subject, various scholars’ opinions on the legal nature of the abovementioned means in criminal procedure. In this article the general norm of using technical means is established. In conclusion the author proposes to include the stated criteria in Chapter 11 of Russian Criminal Procedure Code (Provement) as follows: «Article 89.1 Use of technical means».
legal procedure, legal regulations, technical means, communication, investigation, averment, proof
1. Alekseeva A. P. Dorozhnaya karta dal'neyshego reformirovaniya organov vnutrennih del Rossiyskoy Federacii (kadrovyy professionalizm, otkrytost' dlya doveriya i optimizaciya): problemy i perspektivy realizacii // Yuridicheskaya nauka i pravoohranitel'naya praktika. 2012. № 4. S. 16-20.
2. Vander M. E. Problemy sovershenstvovaniya nauchno-tehnicheskih sredstv i ih primeneniya v processe dokazyvaniya po ugolovnym delal: avtoref. dis. … d-ra yurid. nauk. M., 1994.
3. Romanov V. I. Processual'nye, takticheskie i eticheskie voprosy primeneniya nauchno-tehnicheskih sredstv pri rassledovanii prestupleniy: avtoref. dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. Kazan', 1997.
4. Ugolovno-processual'nyy kodeks Respubliki Kazahstan ot 14.12.1997 (prinyat Ukazom № 207-13 Respubliki Kazahstan ot 01.01.1998) (s posl. izm. ot 04.07.2014) [Elektronnyy resurs]. URL: http://online.zakon.kz/Document/?doc_id=1008442 (data obrascheniya: 12.12.2014 i 07.01.2015).
5. Sadovskiy A. I. Problemy formirovaniya dokazatel'stv sledovatelem s ispol'zovaniem special'nyh poznaniy i tehnicheskih sredstv: dis.. kand. yurid. nauk. Volgograd, 2013.
6. Fedyunin A. E. Pravovoe regulirovanie tehnicheskih sredstv v ugolovnom processe: dis.. d-ra yurid. nauk. Saratov, 2008.
7. Nazarov S. D. Osobennosti normativnogo regulirovaniya uchastiya ponyatyh i ispol'zovaniya tehnicheskih sredstv pri proizvodstve sledstvennyh deystviy v svete izmeneniy, vnosimyh v UPK Rossii // Vestnik Volgogradskoy akademii MVD Rossii. 2013. № 2. S. 81-85.
8. Konstituciya Rossiyskoy Federacii (prinyata vsenarodnym golosovaniem 12 dekabrya 1993 g.) (s uchetom popravok, vnesennyh Zakonami RF o popravkah k Konstitucii RF ot 30.12.2008 № 6-FKZ, ot 30.12.2008 №7-FKZ, ot 05.02.2014 № 2-FKZ, ot 21.07.2014 № 11-FKZ) // SZ RF. 2014. № 31. St. 4398.
9. Sheyfer S. A. Rol' zaschity v formirovanii dokazatel'stvennoy bazy // Gos-vo i pravo. 2006. № 7. S. 60.
10. Glebov V. G. Ugolovnyy process: uchebnik v 3 ch. Ch. 2: Dosudebnoe proizvodstvo po ugolovnym delam / pod red. V. G. Glebova, E. A. Zaycevoy. 4-e izd., pererab. i. dop. Volgograd, 2013.
11. Pechnikov G. A. Dialekticheskie problemy istiny v ugolovnom processe: monogr. Volgograd, 2010.
12. Barinova O. A., Kupin A. F. Dokazatel'stvennoe znachenie vyvodov ekspertov po rezul'tatam issledovaniy rekvizitov dokumentov, nanesennyh sovremennymi materialami pis'ma // Vestnik Volgogradskoy akademii MVD Rossii. 2014. № 1. S. 79.
13. Zhavoronkov V. A. Osobennosti naznacheniya sudebnyh ekspertiz pri rassledovanii plagiata // Vestnik Volgogradskoy akademii MVD Rossii. 2013. № 3. S. 90.
14. Zayceva E. A. Koncepciya razvitiya instituta sudebnoy ekspertizy v usloviyah sostyazatel'nogo ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva: dis. … d-ra yurid. nauk. M., 2008.
15. Zinatullin Z. Z. Ugolovno-processual'noe dokazyvanie. Izhevsk, 1993.
16. Shmatov M. A., Shmatov V. M. Ispol'zovanie elektronnyh sredstv pri raskrytii i rassledovanii ekonomicheskih prestupleniy // Vestnik Volgogradskoy akademii MVD Rossii. 2012. № 2. S. 182, 183.
