The article deals with the issues concerning statutory regulation of the inspection performed at the stage of initiation of criminal cases and primarily examination in terms of the right enforcement role of the mentioned stage. The author analyzes the collision of regulatory prescriptions of Art. 144 Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation, associated with performance of the examination, and Art. 179 Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation, which effect is defined for the group of participants which appear after initiation of criminal cases. The conclusion on the necessity of legislative recognition of the possibility of compulsory examination of actually detained persons is drawn with consideration of the legal views of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation. The study of the issues associated with the observance of rights and legal interests of right-minded citizens (victims of a crime, witnesses) during inspection activities leads the author to the conclusion that it is necessary to recognize legislatively examination of persons, which file for a crime in respect of them, and witnesses upon their consent or at their request.
stage of initiation of criminal cases, examination, criminal procedure compulsion, inspection activities, views of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation, proof
1. Vicin S. E. Institut vozbuzhdeniya dela v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve Rossii // Ros. yusticiya. 2003. № 6.
2. Serebrova S. P. Problemy racionalizacii dosudebnogo proizvodstva. N. Novgorod, 1997.
3. Karetnikov A. S., Karetnikov S. A. Sledstvennye deystviya kak sposoby proverki soobscheniya o prestuplenii [Elektronnyy resurs]. Dostup iz sprav.-pravovoy sistemy «Konsul'tantPlyus».
4. Grishina E. P. Vozbuzhdenie ugolovnogo dela - model' obnovlennaya, problemy prezhnie // Ros. yusticiya. 2014. № 10.
5. Petrov A. V. Znachenie i neobhodimost' stadii vozbuzhdeniya ugolovnogo dela // Zakonnost'. 2014. № 5.
6. Shipicyna V. V. Stadiya vozbuzhdeniya ugolovnogo dela kak garantiya zakonnosti i obosnovannosti ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva // Nauchnye problemy gumanitarnyh issledovaniy. 2011. Vyp. 11.
7. Po delu o proverke konstitucionnosti otdel'nyh polozheniy federal'nogo zakona ob osnovnyh garantiyah izbiratel'nyh prav i prava na uchastie v referendume grazhdan RF v svyazi s zaprosom gruppy deputatov Gosudarstvennoy Dumy i zhalobami grazhdan S. A. Buntmana, K. A. Katanyana i K. S. Rozhkova [Elektronnyy resurs]: postanovlenie Konstitucionnogo suda RF ot 30 oktyabrya 2003 g. № 15-P // Ros. gaz. 2003. 31 okt.
8. Manova N. S., Franciforov Yu. V. Problemnye aspekty stadii vozbuzhdeniya ugolovnogo dela po novomu UPK RF // Ros. sud'ya. 2003. № 5.
9. O vnesenii izmeneniy v stat'i 62 i 303 Ugolovnogo kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federacii i Ugolovno-processual'nyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federacii: feder. zakon ot 4 marta 2013 g. № 23-FZ // SZ RF. 2013. № 9. St. 875.
10. Zayceva E. A., Sadovskiy A. I. Formirovanie dokazatel'stv sledovatelem s ispol'zovaniem special'nyh poznaniy i nauchno-tehnicheskih sredstv: monogr. Volgograd, 2013.
11. Zayceva E. A. Realizaciya sostyazatel'nyh nachal pri primenenii special'nyh poznaniy v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve: monogr. Volgograd, 2006.
12. Po delu o proverke konstitucionnosti polozheniy chasti pervoy stat'i 47 i chasti vtoroy stat'i 51 Ugolovno-processual'nogo kodeksa RSFSR v svyazi s zhaloboy grazhdanina V. I. Maslova [Elektronnyy resurs]: postanovlenie Konstitucionnogo Suda RF ot 27 iyunya 2000 g. № 11-P // Vestnik Konstitucionnogo suda RF. 2000. № 5.
