The article looks at the ability of the criminal procedure law in effect to ensure the rights of criminal proceeding participants proclaimed by the Constitution of the Russian Federation, especially of an accused (defendant). In the analysis of the criminal procedure law the authors observe a tendency for differentiation of criminal proceedings. Certain criminal procedure scholars and practitioners rightfully suggest that criminal proceedings should not necessarily be conducted in a uniform manner. Depending on elements of a crime traditional order of a proceeding can be simplified or perplexed on the contrary. With this in mind the question of social usefulness of the aboved mantioned institutions in isolation from the priorities established and implimented by the state criminal law policy can not be left without attention. The issue is in the search of a criterion that will ensure the protection of rights and freedoms of the criminal proceeding participants and will to bring together the interests of the state in „economical“ justice.
implementation of rights and freedoms of the accused, criminal proceeding differentiation
1. Berezina L. V., Bykov V. M. Dokazyvanie v stadii vozbuzhdeniya ugolovnogo dela po UPK RF. Kazan': Taglimat, 2006.
2. Cit. po: Luneev V. V. Prestupnost' HH veka: mirovye, regional'nye i rossiyskie tendencii. 2-e izd., pererab. i dop. M.: Volters Kluver, 2005; URL: http://lawlibrary.ru/izdanie54885.html (data obrascheniya: 15.02.2016).
3. Kruglikov A. P. O nekotoryh tendenciyah v sovremennom ugolovno-processual'nom zakonodatel'stve // Mirovoy sud'ya. 2012. № 3. S. 8-12.
4. Zayceva E. A. Novyy zakon o sokraschennom doznanii i reglamentaciya ispol'zovaniya special'nyh poznaniy v dosudebnom proizvodstve po ugolovnym delam, ili Hoteli kak luchshe, a poluchilos' kak vsegda.. // Ros. sud'ya. 2013. № 4; URL: http://lawlibrary.ru›article2261386.html (data obrascheniya: 15.02.2016).
5. Zayceva E. A. Neprocessual'naya forma ekspertnyh issledovaniy // Sudebnaya ekspertiza. 2011. № 4. S. 5-24.
6. Po delu o proverke konstitucionnosti punkta 1 chasti tret'ey stat'i 31 Ugolovno-processual'nogo kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federacii v svyazi s zhaloboy grazhdanki A. S. Lymar': postanovlenie Konstitucionnogo Suda RF ot 25 fevralya 2016 g. № 6-P. Dostup iz sprav.-pravovoy sistemy «Konsul'tantPlyus».
7. Putin: Sud prisyazhnyh mozhno rasprostranit' do urovnya rayonnyh sudov. URL: http://www.vedomosti.ru (data obrascheniya: 16.02.2016).
