Exact information acquisition in the process of exhibition procedure for identification depends on the tactic chosen by the investigator for this investigatory action implementation. The article touches upon the inconveniences and tactical mistakes revealed in the activity of investigators in the process of preparing for the exhibition procedure; it also displays tactical factors of exhibition for identification in conditions that exclude an identifier’s visual observation of an identifiable person; it develops the methods that help to provide conditions excluding visual observation; it covers some problematic issues of selecting subjects similar by outwards signs to the shown-up subject. The statement has been reasoned that selection of similar object should be realized in the complex manner: it’s desirable that line-up decoys would not only look like the identifiable subject but would also have some distinguishing marks that have been mentioned by identifiers during the questioning. Tactical aspects of identification results fixation have also been covered. The recommendation has been justified to provide a defence lawyer presence only at the place of his defendant location, without seeing the identifier. The article underlines the necessity of warning witnesses more about non-disclosure of data concerning the identifier’s appearance.
exhibition for identification, conditions, excluding visual observation, identifiable person, identifier, defence lawyer, similarity of subjects’ appearance, criminal case participants safety provision
1. Bulgakov V. G. Osobennosti pred'yavleniya dlya opoznaniya cheloveka po ego dinamicheskim priznakam // Vestnik Volgogradskoy akademii MVD Rossii. 2011. № 3 (18). S. 104-111.
2. Zamylin E. I. Pred'yavleniya dlya opoznaniya: k voprosu o bezopasnosti dobrosovestnyh uchastnikov ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva // Vestnik Volgogradskoy akademii MVD Rossii. 2011. № 2 (17). S. 90-97.
3. Smushkin A. B. Pred'yavlenie dlya opoznaniya v usloviyah, isklyuchayuschih vizual'noe nablyudenie opoznayuschego opoznavaemym kak sposob obespecheniya bezopasnosti uchastnika ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva // Ros. sledovatel'. 2013. № 15. S. 11-13.
4. Popova O. A. Ugolovno-processual'nye i organizacionno-takticheskie oshibki: preduprezhdenie, vyyavlenie i ispravlenie sledovatelem: ucheb. posobie. Volgograd, 2012. 88 s.
5. Sledstvennye deystviya: psihologiya, taktika, tehnologiya: ucheb. posobie / M. I. Enikeev [i. dr.]. M., 2011. 216 s.
6. Apellyacionnoe opredelenie Verhovnogo Suda Respubliki Altay ot 25.12.2014 po delu № 22-707. Dostup iz sprav.-pravovoy sistemy «Konsul'tantPlyus».
7. Apellyacionnoe opredelenie Moskovskogo gorodskogo suda ot 11.03.2015 po delu № 10-**/2015. Dostup iz sprav.-pravovoy sistemy «Konsul'tantPlyus».
8. Ob otkaze v prinyatii k rassmotreniyu zhaloby grazhdanina Orlova D. I. na narushenie ego konstitucionnyh prav polozheniem chasti vos'moy stat'i 193 Ugolovno-processual'nogo kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federacii: opredelenie Konstitucionnogo Suda RF ot 18.12.2008 № 1090-O-O. Dostup iz sprav.-pravovoy sistemy «Konsul'tantPlyus».
