ABOUT SOME DEBATABLE QUESTIONS OF APPLICATION OF ACQUISITIVE PRESCRIPTION TO THE LAND PLOTS AS TO REAL ESTATE OBJECTS
Abstract and keywords
Abstract (English):
In article provisions of the scientific doctrine, the legislation and court practice on cases of buying of private property the parcels of land on prescription of ownership are researched. The debatability of the existing conceptual offers on refusal of the principle of conscientiousness of the davnostny owner is proved that will lead only to increase in number of cases of unfair occupancy as unauthorized capture by others parcels of land. It will hardly give positive effect from the point of view of stability of civil circulation. Also increase in term of an acquisitive prescription till 30 years will be so inefficient. Much more perspective option of reform of institute of an acquisitive prescription to the author reduction of forms and types of property which of structure the parcels of land, and also accurate standard fixing of features and procedures of acquisition owing to an acquisitive prescription of the rights to shares in the right of common property to the parcels of land can be purchased seems.

Keywords:
acquisitive prescription, parcel of land, property right. court practice, conscientiousness, openness, continuity, term
References

1. Andreev Yu. N. Sobstvennost' i pravo sobstvennosti: civilisticheskie aspekty: monogr. M., 2013.

2. Voronova Yu. V. Priobretatel'naya davnost' v grazhdanskom prave Rossiyskoy Federacii: avtoref. dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. M., 2007.

3. Ostashevskiy M. A. Zaschita prav dobrosovestnogo priobretatelya: avtoref. dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. Krasnodar, 2006.

4. Bubnov M. Yu. Priobretatel'naya davnost' kak osnovanie priobreteniya prava sobstvennosti: dis.. kand. yurid. nauk. Ryazan', 2003.

5. O nekotoryh voprosah, voznikayuschih v sudebnoy praktike pri razreshenii sporov, svyazannyh s zaschitoy prava sobstvennosti i drugih veschnyh prav: punkt 15 Postanovleniya Plenuma Verhovnogo Suda RF i Plenuma Vysshego Arbitrazhnogo Suda RF ot 29 aprelya 2010 g. № 10/22 // Byulleten' Verhovnogo Suda RF. 2010. № 7.

6. Landakov V. N. Dobrosovestnost' davnostnogo vladeniya v grazhdanskom prave Rossii // Novaya pravovaya mysl'. 2011. № 5.

7. Grazhdanskoe pravo: uchebnik / pod red. A. P. Sergeeva, Yu. K. Tolstogo. M., 1998. Ch. 1.

8. Boltanova E. S. Prava na zemel'nye uchastki: teoriya, zakonodatel'stvo i praktika ego primeneniya. Rostov n/D, 2006.

9. Rublevskiy R. S. Teoreticheskie osnovy sistemy veschnyh prav lic, ne yavlyayuschihsya sobstvennikami: dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. Volgograd, 2010.

10. Charkin S. A. Zemel'nye pravootnosheniya kak mezhotraslevaya pravovaya kategoriya: monogr. M., 2012.

11. Zemlyakova G. L. Vedenie gosudarstvennogo kadastra nedvizhimosti kak funkciya gosudarstvennogo upravleniya v sfere ispol'zovaniya i ohrany zemel': monogr. M., 2013.

12. Opredelenie Vysshego Arbitrazhnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federacii ot 18 marta 2011 g. № VAS-2632/11 po delu № A40-25392/10-9-219. Dostup iz sprav.-pravovoy sistemy «Konsul'tantPlyus»

13. Landakov V. N. Priobretatel'naya davnost' v grazhdanskom prave Rossii: dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. Volgograd, 2011.

14. Opredelenie Vysshego Arbitrazhnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federacii ot 26 oktyabrya 2012 g. № VAS-13430/12 po delu № A41-31266/11. Dostup iz sprav.-pravovoy sistemy «Konsul'tant plyus».

15. Savin R. A. Priobretenie prava sobstvennosti na zemel'nyy uchastok po davnosti vladeniya: avtoref. dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. M., 2012.

16. Rudov M. V. Teoreticheskie i prakticheskie problemy rassmotreniya sporov o priobretenii doli v prave obschey dolevoy sobstvennosti po davnosti vladeniya // Imuschestvennye otnosheniya v Rossiyskoy Federacii. 2014. № 10.

17. Butova E. A. Obschaya sobstvennost' v silu priobretatel'noy davnosti: da ili net? // Izvestiya Yugo-Zapadnogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya «Istoriya i pravo». 2015. № 3.

18. Reshenie Glazunovskogo rayonnogo suda Orlovskoy oblasti ot 17 maya 2016 g. po delu № 2-132/2016. URL: https://rospravosudie.com (data obrascheniya: 06.07.2016).

19. Opredelenie Verhovnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federacii ot 28 dekabrya 1998 g. № 25-vp98-27. Dostup iz sprav.-pravovoy sistemy «Konsul'tant plyus».

20. Lapina V. V. Institut priobretatel'noy davnosti i sposoby zaschity davnostnogo vladeniya v grazhdanskom prave Rossii: dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. Tver', 2006.

21. Opredelenie Vysshego Arbitrazhnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federacii ot 8 oktyabrya 2008 № 12399/08 po delu № A35-4902/07-S4. Dostup iz sprav.-pravovoy sistemy «Konsul'tant plyus».

22. Bagaev V. A. Priobretenie nedvizhimogo imuschestva po davnosti vladeniya po rossiyskomu i angliyskomu pravu: avtoref. dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. SPb, 2015.

23. Ustyukova V. V. Vozniknovenie prava sobstvennosti na zemlyu v poryadke priobretatel'noy davnosti // Trudy Instituta gosudarstva i prava RAN. 2015. № 1.

24. Gaybatova K. G. Priobretatel'naya davnost' - osnovanie vozniknoveniya prava chastnoy sobstvennosti // Vestnik Dagestanskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2011. № 2.

Login or Create
* Forgot password?