Anchoring in Chapter 32.1 of the Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation in the abbreviated form of inquiry is a logical result of the long-standing need for simplification of the procedure in criminal cases of minor offenses committed under the evidence. In practice, however ambiguously apprehended the existing simplified procedure. Analysis study of criminal cases investigated in the abbreviated form of inquiry in the territory of the Samara region, revealed a lack of viability of this form of investigation and the reluctance of investigators to apply the simplified procedure in such a way that there is at the moment. Stops practitioners the opportunity to return to the normal order of the proceedings at any time - right up to the removal of a judge in the deliberation room. The conclusion about the need to find ways to further optimize the production process in a simplified form to achieve the purpose of criminal proceedings.
implementation in practice, pre-investigation inspection, minor crimes, investigative and other procedural actions, abbreviated inquiry
1. Zayceva E. A., Seidov M. M. Sovershenstvovanie normativnoy reglamentacii deyatel'nosti organov doznaniya: diskussiya prodolzhaetsya // Vestnik Sarat. gos. yurid. akademii. 2015. № 6 (107). S. 159-162.
2. Obzor praktiki vzaimodeystviya podrazdeleniy policii pri provedenii proverok po soobscheniyam o prestupleniyah, proizvodstvo doznaniya po kotorym vozmozhno v sokraschennoy forme, po itogam raboty v pervom polugodii 2015 g. ot 04.09.2015. № 16/19-5209.
3. Poyasnitel'naya zapiska k proektu Federal'nogo zakona № 632173-5 «O vnesenii izmeneniy v Ugolovno-processual'nyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federacii v svyazi s vvedeniem instituta sokraschennoy formy ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva». Dostup iz sprav.-pravovoy sistemy «Konsul'tantPlyus».
4. Obzor kachestva podgotovki materialov dosledstvennyh proverok po soobscheniyam o prestupleniyah, proizvodstvo doznaniya po kotorym vozmozhno v sokraschennoy forme, po itogam raboty v yanvare-mae 2016 g. ot 23.06.2016. № 16/19-3799.
5. Sil'vestrov P. S., Marficin P. G. Problemy pravoprimeneniya pri proizvodstve doznaniya v sokraschennoy forme // Vestnik Nizhegor. un-ta im. N. I. Lobachevskogo. 2015. № 5-6. S. 312-314.
6. Kuvaldina Yu. V., Lazareva V. A. Sokraschennoe doznanie: sootvetstvuet li procedura naznacheniyu ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva // Vestnik Samar. gos. un-ta. 2014. № 11/1 (122). S. 50-61.
7. Ekspress-informaciya po analizu praktiki primeneniya polozheniy Federal'nogo zakona ot 04.03.2013 № 23-FZ v processual'noy deyatel'nosti podrazdeleniy UT MVD Rossii po SKFO po proizvodstvu doznaniya v sokraschennoy forme ot 09.09.2013. № 16/19-4871.
8. Ugolovnoe delo № 1-49/13 po obvineniyu Ch. A. A. po ch. 1 st. 119 UK RF (arhiv suda Samarskogo rayona); ugolovnoe delo №1-66/13 po obvineniyu B. Yu. V. po ch. 3 st. 30, ch. 1 st. 158 UK RF (arhiv suda Samarskogo rayona).
9. Informacionno-analiticheskiy obzor o primenenii polozheniy Federal'nogo zakona ot 04.03.2013 № 23-FZ v chasti proizvodstva doznaniya v sokraschennoy forme podrazdeleniyami doznaniya UT MVD Rossii po PFO ot 14.03.2016 № 16/19-1612.
10. Ugolovnoe delo № 10-10/16 po obvineniyu B. A. A. po st. 322.3 UK RF (arhiv suda Samarskogo rayona).
11. Popova O. A., Skogoreva T. F. Osobennosti rassledovaniya prestupleniy v sokraschennoy forme // Vestnik Volgogradskoy akademii MVD Rossii. 2016. № 1 (36). S. 99-102.
12. Poyasnitel'naya zapiska k proektu federal'nogo zakona «O vnesenii izmeneniy v Ugolovno-processual'nyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federacii (v chasti vvedeniya osobogo poryadka dosudebnogo proizvodstva») URL: regulation.gov.ru/get.php?view_id=1&doc_id=65944 (data obrascheniya: 26.06.2016).
