The principle of participation of citizens, the public and religious organizations in the solution of the questions concerning them land rights was rather consistently enshrined in land and other legislation of the Russian Federation, territorial subjects of the Russian Federation and acts of local government bodies earlier, and was repeatedly put into practice by courts. However since March 1, 2015 Art. 31 of ZK Russian Federation and other standards of the land right regulating the mechanism of realization of this principle became invalid though the principle is still fixed in ZK Russian Federation. At the moment ZK Russian Federation provides the accounting of opinion of citizens and their associations only concerning establishment of a public easement, and the town-planning legislation (by means of public hearings) on a number of questions of land use and building. However both of these opportunities have local character that demands restoration and extension of procedures of the accounting of opinion of the public when granting the land plots which are earlier provided in Art. 31 of the Land code of the Russian Federation.
public hearings, public easement, rules of land use and building, public and religious organizations, legal entities, municipality, information, accounting of opinion of the population
1. Ob otkaze v prinyatii k rassmotreniyu zhaloby grazhdanina Potapova Sergeya Vladislavovicha na narushenie ego konstitucionnyh prav abzacem pervym punkta 3 stat'i 31 Zemel'nogo kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federacii: opredelenie Konstitucionnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federacii ot 17 iyulya 2014 g. № 1658-O. Dostup iz sprav.-pravovoy sistemy «Konsul'tantPlyus».
2. Ob otkaze v peredache dela v Prezidium Vysshego arbitrazhnogo suda Rossiyskoy Federacii: opredelenie Vysshego arbitrazhnogo suda RF ot 16 dekabrya 2010 g. № VAS-16380/10. Dostup iz sprav.-pravovoy sistemy «Konsul'tantPlyus».
3. Postanovlenie Vosemnadcatogo arbitrazhnogo apellyacionnogo suda ot 12.02.2010 № 18AP-337/2010 po delu № A34-5206/2009. Dostup iz sprav.-pravovoy sistemy «Konsul'tantPlyus».
4. Postanovlenie Devyatnadcatogo arbitrazhnogo apellyacionnogo suda ot 16 noyabrya 2009 g. po delu № A35-837/09-S2. Dostup iz sprav.-pravovoy sistemy «Konsul'tantPlyus».
5. Apellyacionnoe opredelenie Verhovnogo suda Respubliki Kareliya ot 10 avgusta 2012 g. po delu № 33-2299/2012. Dostup iz sprav.-pravovoy sistemy «Konsul'tantPlyus».
6. Kiteleva A. G, Kovin I. A., Tyndyuk M. K. K voprosu ob uchastii grazhdan v obsuzhdenii proektov dokumentov po voprosam osuschestvleniya gradostroitel'noy deyatel'nosti // Master’s Journal. 2015. № 2. S. 300.
7. Korosteleva M. V. Normativnoe zakreplenie form neposredstvennogo uchastiya naseleniya v osuschestvlenii mestnogo samoupravleniya // Biznes. Obrazovanie. Pravo. Vestnik Volgogradskogo instituta biznesa. 2008. № 7. S. 113-116.
8. Anisimov A. P. O nekotoryh novellah zakonodatel'stva o poryadke provedeniya publichnyh slushaniy // Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava. 2006. № 7. S. 23-27.
9. Brovchenko V. N., Degtyarev O. Yu., Kirienko G. S. O nekotoryh voprosah poryadka organizacii i provedeniya publichnyh slushaniy v Rossii // Grazhdanskoe obschestvo v Rossii i za rubezhom. 2013. № 3. S. 2-5.
10. Ocheretina M. A. Ponyatie i tipologiya instituta publichnyh slushaniy // Konstitucionnoe i municipal'noe pravo. 2008. № 23. S. 22-25.
