In article legal and theoretical problems of interaction of operational search bodies and the population which are expressed that the person getting to the sphere of operational search activities (in any quality) are considered, becomes the subject of specific legal relationship. It is allocated with new obligations that, in turn, allows to exercise certain rights. The analysis of legal status of the interacting subjects involved in the sphere of operational search activities is carried out. The offer on fixing of the rights and obligations of the helping persons in the Federal law «About Operational Search Activities», like the rights and obligations of the bodies performing operational search activities is made. It is represented that it is impossible to fight effectively organized, professional crime without upgrade of legal status of the helping person and its proper coordination with regulations of the penal and criminal procedure legislation of the Russian Federation. In it special legal status of the persons rendering confidential assistance which is snugged not only in the Federal law «About Operational Search Activities», but also in other regulations is shown. The separate rights of the persons involved in the sphere of operational search activities are considered.
operational search activity, cooperation, interaction, the public, operational search units
1. Anufriev V. A. Social'nyy status i aktivnost' lichnosti. M., 1984.
2. Anisimov A. L. Pravovoy status rabotnika v trudovyh otnosheniyah i trebovaniya k ego delovym kachestvam // Pravo i ekonomika. 2007. № 12. S. 61-67.
3. Pavlichenko N. V. Problemy vzaimodeystviya operativno-razysknyh organov i naseleniya: teoreticheskie i prikladnye problemy // Obschestvo i pravo. 2016. № 3. S. 148-151.
4. Pavlichenko N. V. Problemy vzaimodeystviya operativno-razysknyh organov i naseleniya // Vestnik Volgogradskoy akademii MVD Rossii. 2015. № 3 (34). S. 99-104.
5. Ryad avtorov predlagaet obnarodovat' imena lic, sodeystvuyuschih pravoohranitel'nym organam v 30-50-h gg. XX v., kak eto sdelano v Pol'she, Chehii, Pribaltike. Sm., naprimer: Petruhin I. L. Lichnye tayny (chelovek i vlast'). M., 1998.
6. Federal'nyy zakon «Ob operativno-rozysknoy deyatel'nosti»: nauch.-prakt. kommentariy / pod red. prof. V. V. Nikolyuka. 4-e izd., pererab. i dop. M., 1999.
7. Vagin O. A., Isichenko A. P., Chechetin A. E. Kommentariy k Federal'nomu zakonu «Ob operativno-rozysknoy deyatel'nosti» (postat.). M., 2009.
8. V. F. Lugovik v svoih rabotah otmechaet, chto seychas mozhno uverenno govorit' o nastoyatel'noy neobhodimosti sozdaniya priemlemoy dlya nauchnogo soobschestva chastnoy teorii neglasnosti rassledovaniya i raskrytiya prestupleniy. Sm.: Lugovik V. F. Neglasnost' rassledovaniya i operativno-razysknaya deyatel'nost' // Pravovaya mysl' v obrazovanii, nauke i praktike. 2014. № 1. S. 27-29.
