The article focuses on the institute of the criminal procedural complaint. The authors consider that the outcome of the complaint will be different in various types of the criminal process: adversarial (winner-loser) and objectively true. Thus, the appeal is one of the aspects for establishing the objective truth in objectively true type of the criminal process and it also assists a credible crime solution (fight against crime) as a common purpose of the criminal process. That is the procedural complaint has an objectively true nature and direction in objectively true criminal process. Unlike it adversarial type of the criminal process (Criminal Procedural Code of the RF) in view of its adversary character doesn’t admit an objective truth (the winner is determined by the prosecution and defense in the adversarial process); procedural complaints have an adversarial-winning direction regardless of whether the position of the prevailing party is true or not in such type of criminal process. In adversarial type of the criminal process the adversarial form (procedure) has primacy over the problem of establishing the case facts (the procedure is more important than the objective truth), therefore on the whole the procedural complaints deal with the violations of the procedural form by the opposite party in the legal issue (while being won). The authors support the objectively true type of the criminal process; they consider the objectively true justice in the criminal process to be above the equity of the winner in the adversarial criminal process.
objectively true type of the criminal process, adversarial type of the criminal process (winner-loser), objectively true procedural complaint, adversarial-winning procedural complaint, complaint in the adversarial process, primacy of the procedural form over the objective truth, violations of the procedural form, human rights, force of the party, prosecution and defense, common purpose, state and person, formal equality of the parties, winning interest, adversarial process winner, objectively credible crime solution, fight against crime, objective truth bill
1. Bezlepkin B. T. Kommentariy k Ugolovno-processual'nomu kodeksu Rossiyskoy Federacii (postat.). 13-e izd., pererab. i dop. M., 2015.
2. Voskresenskiy F. A. Princip sostyazatel'nosti kak sderzhivayuschiy faktor ugolovno-processual'noy deyatel'nosti na stadii predvaritel'nogo rassledovaniya // Vestnik Volgogradskoy akademii MVD Rossii. 2015. № 3 (34).
3. Luneev V. V. Epoha globalizacii i prestupnost': monografiya. M., 2015.
4. Mizulina E. B. Ugolovnyy process: koncepciya samoogranicheniya gosudarstva. Tartu, 1991.
5. Mihaylovkaya I. B. Nastol'naya kniga sud'i po dokazyvaniyu v ugolovnom processe. M., 2006.
6. O vnesenii izmeneniy v Ugolovno-processual'nyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federacii v svyazi s vvedeniem instituta ustanovleniya ob'ektivnoy istiny po ugolovnomu delu: proekt feder. zakona. URL: http://sledcom.ru (data obrascheniya: 29.10.2016).
7. Pechnikov G. A. Dialekticheskie problemy istiny v ugolovnom processe: monografiya. 2-e izd., ispr. i dop. Volgograd, 2010.
8. Prava cheloveka i novoe zakonodatel'stvo (materialy kruglogo stola) // Gosudarstvo i pravo. 2003. № 6.
9. Praktika primeneniya Ugolovno-processual'nogo kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federacii: prakt. posobie / pod red. V. P. Verina. M., 2008.
10. Strogovich M. S. Priroda sovetskogo ugolovnogo processa i princip sostyazatel'nosti. M., 1939.
11. Teoriya ugolovnogo processa: monografiya / pod red. d-ra yurid. nauk N. A. Kolokolova. M., 2013. Ch. 2.
12. Ugolovnyy process Rossii: uchebnik / A. S. Aleksandrov [i dr.]; nauch. red. V. T. Tomin. M., 2003.
