The article deals with decision-making issues as a result of the crime reports check and law enforcement aspects of the departmental and judicial control, prosecutorial supervision of legality of decision-making while taking a criminal action. The author analyzes the criteria of the legality and explanation of the decision to refuse to take a criminal action as a result of the legal positions of Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation from 10.02.2009 № 1. The author makes a conclusion about the imperfection of the regulation of Articles 144 and 145 of the Criminal Procedural Code of the Russian Federation related to the facts to establish terms (time limits) of checks and types of decision-making. The author examines the problem to transmit crime reports to preliminary investigation bodies with proper legal competence if they refuse to register crimes. The author formulates proposals to supplement Article 144 of the Criminal Procedural Code of the Russian Federation with a new Part 3.1 where it is necessary to solve the problem to establish terms (time limits) of checks related to crime report transmitted to another preliminary investigation body within its legal competence limits (legal jurisdiction).
stage of taking a criminal action, checking a crime report, authorities of the inquiry body, interrogator, terms (time limits) of checks related to report, transmitting case materials to investigation bodies with proper legal competence, refusal to take a criminal action
1. Gavrilov B. Ya. Realii i mify vozbuzhdeniya ugolovnogo dela // Ugolovnoe sudoproizvodstvo. 2010. № 2. S. 7-10.
2. Karetnikov A. S., Koretnikov S. A. Sledstvennye deystviya kak sposoby proverki soobscheniya o prestuplenii // Zakonnost'. 2014. № 7. S. 37-42.
3. Kruglikov A. P. Nuzhna li stadiya vozbuzhdeniya ugolovnogo dela v sovremennom ugolovnom processe Rossii? // Rossiyskaya yusticiya. 2011. № 6. S. 56-58.
4. Zayceva E. A. Arsenal sredstv dokazyvaniya v stadii vozbuzhdeniya ugolovnogo dela v kontekste Federal'nogo zakona ot 4 marta 2013 g. № 23-FZ // Problemy otpravleniya pravosudiya po ugolovnym delam v sovremennoy Rossii: teoriya i praktika: materialy V mezhdunar. nauch.-prakt. konf. (YuZGU, 11-13 aprelya 2013 g.). Kursk, 2013.
5. Sheyfer S. A. Transformaciya stadii vozbuzhdeniya ugolovnogo dela v svyazi s prinyatiem FZ-23 ot 4 marta 2013 g. // Vektor nauki TGU. Seriya: Yuridicheskie nauki. 2014. № 2 (17).
6. Glebov V. G. Sledstvennye deystviya // Ugolovnyy process: uchebnik: v 3 ch. Ch. 2. Dosudebnoe proizvodstvo po ugolovnym delam / pod red. V. G. Glebova, E. A. Zaycevoy. Volgograd, 2013.
7. Kudryavceva Yu. A. Poluchenie obrazcov dlya sravnitel'nogo issledovaniya v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve Rossii (processual'naya priroda, poryadok, dokazatel'stvennoe znachenie): dis.. kand. yurid. nauk. Chelyabinsk, 2013.
8. Zayceva E. A. Reglamentaciya sudebnoy ekspertizy na stadii vozbuzhdeniya ugolovnogo dela: sovremennoe sostoyanie i puti sovershenstvovaniya // Sudebnaya ekspertiza. 2016. № 1 (45). S. 38-44.
9. Ustov T. R. Obespechenie prav uchastnikov sledstvennyh i inyh processual'nyh deystviy pri proverke soobscheniya o prestuplenii: dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. Krasnodar, 2016.
10. Oficial'nyy sayt General'noy prokuratury RF. Osnovnye statisticheskie dannye o deyatel'nosti organov prokuratury. URL: http://genproc.gov.ru/stat/data/ (data obrascheniya: 16.01.2017).
11. Ugolovnyy process: uchebnik dlya studentov vuzov, obuchayuschihsya po special'nosti «Yurisprudenciya» / pod red. V. P. Bozh'eva. M., 2002.
12. Grinyuk E. N. Rol' prokurora v obespechenii prav uchastnikov dosudebnogo proizvodstva po ugolovnym delam: monogr. / E. N. Grinyuk, E. A. Zayceva. Volgograd, 2013.
13. O praktike rassmotreniya sudami zhalob v poryadke stat'i 125 Ugolovno-processual'nogo kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federacii: postanovlenie Plenuma Verhovnogo Suda RF ot 10 fevralya 2009 g. № 1 (red. ot 29.11.2016). Dostup iz sprav.-prav. sistemy «Konsul'tantPlyus».
14. Postanovlenie Moskovskogo gorodskogo suda ot 11 maya 2016 g. № 4u-1943/2016. Dostup iz sprav.-prav. sistemy «Konsul'tantPlyus».
15. Apellyacionnoe postanovlenie Moskovskogo gorodskogo suda ot 15 iyunya 2016 g. po delu № 10-8378/2016. Dostup iz sprav.-prav. sistemy «Konsul'tantPlyus».
16. Postanovlenie Moskovskogo gorodskogo suda ot 11 dekabrya 2015 g. № 4u-6369/2015. Dostup iz sprav.-prav. sistemy «Konsul'tantPlyus».
17. Ob utverzhdenii Instrukcii o poryadke priema, registracii i razresheniya v territorial'nyh organah Ministerstva vnutrennih del Rossiyskoy Federacii zayavleniy i soobscheniy o prestupleniyah, ob administrativnyh pravonarusheniyah, o proisshestviyah: prikaz MVD Rossii ot 29 avgusta 2014 g. № 736 (red. ot 07.11.2016). Dostup iz sprav.-prav. sistemy «Konsul'tantPlyus».
18. Makarenko M. M., Ermakov S. V. Vozbuzhdenie ugolovnogo dela: problemnye voprosy // Rossiyskiy sledovatel'. 2015. № 6. S. 27-31.
19. Artemov L. A. Stadiya vozbuzhdeniya ugolovnogo dela: processual'nye osobennosti i pravovaya reglamentaciya deystviy pravoohranitel'nyh organov: dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. Vladimir, 2004.
20. Tyutyunik R. N., Novopashin R. R. Peredacha soobscheniya o prestuplenii po territorial'noy podsledstvennosti kak sposob ukrytiya prestupleniya // Zakonnost'. 2015. № 9. S. 34-37.
