In the article the criminal-legal influence is regarded as a phenomenon, transformation of which takes place primarily at the ideological level under modern conditions. It is noted that the change of the ideological content of the mentioned institution has led to its slow degradation and partly to the loss of its essence. Its continuous transformation taking place in recent years changes the criminal-legal influence not only quantitative. The change of the basic idea takes place in its content mitigating the attitude to the mechanism of criminal-legal compulsion as the main penal instrument of the state to counteract crime. It is largely due to the promotion of postmodern postulates rejecting the former things of value, knowledge and concept of phenomena having the long-standing nature. There is the dependence between criminal-legal influence and ongoing processes in the society. It is referred to their unprecedented nature affecting the basic things of value that are of crucial significance for modern society. It’s been noted that the criminal-legal influence is a direct consequence of state policy on the one hand, and it acts as one of the effective means implementing ideas of new order in real life, on the other one. On the basis of the foreign criminal law, alterations and additions (amendments) introduced into the Criminal Law of the Russian Federation and also the processes of political nature it has been demonstrated the role of criminal-legal influence in legal confirmation of replacement of things of value taking place at the social level. On this basis the problem of further development of criminal-legal influence is placed on the transformational level of its basic idea as a phenomenon. In author’s opinion of particular interest to study today are issues involving not the improvement of individual measures against the perpetrators but the whole direction of development of criminal-legal influence and its role in the state coercion mechanisms.
postmodern, criminal-legal influence, criminal legal policy, crime, counteraction
1. URL.: https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki (data obrascheniya 17.01.2017).
2. Anderson P. Istoki postmoderna. M., 2011.
3. Filosofiya. Enciklopedicheskiy slovar'. M., 2006.
4. Barak Obama ob'yasnil, pochemu on ne poehal na olimpiadu v Sochi. URL: // https://www.kommersant.ru (data obrascheniya: 05.06.2017).
5. Merkel' poprosila zaschitit' prava geev v Chechne. URL: // https://meduza.io/news (data obrascheniya: 05.06.2017).
6. Russo Zh.-Zh. O prichinah neravenstva. SPb., 1907.
7. Kleymenov I. M. Sravnitel'naya kriminologiya. M., 2012.
8. Gilinskiy Ya. I. Ugolovnoe zakonodatel'stvo v sovremennoy Rossii: kriticheskie zametki // Ugolovnoe pravo: strategiya razvitiya v XXI v: materialy XII nauch.-prakt. konf. M., 2015.
9. Milyukov S. F. Krah tolerantnosti i mul'tkul'turalizma kak vyzov rossiyskoy kriminologii // Kriminologiya: vchera, segodnya, zavtra. 2015. № 3. S. 38-44.
10. Danilov A. P. Prestupnostivedcheskoe polozhenie o terpimosti (kriminologicheskaya teoriya tolerantnosti) // Kriminologiya: vchera, segodnya, zavtra. 2015. № 4. S 27-30.
11. Yakovlev A. M., Kogan V. M. Vstupitel'naya stat'ya k knige N. Kristi Prichinyaya bol'. Rol' nakazaniya v ugolovnoy politike. SPb., 2011.
12. Kristi N. Prichinyaya bol'. Rol' nakazaniya v ugolovnoy politike. SPb., 2011.
13. Luneev V. V. Prestupnost' XX veka. Mirovye, regional'nye i rossiyskie tendencii. 2-e izd., pererab. i dop. M., 2005.
14. Kleymenov M. P. O koncepcii bor'by s prestupnost'yu v Rossii // Sovershenstvovanie zakonodatel'noy i pravoprimenitel'noy deyatel'nosti v sfere bor'by s pravonarusheniyami: mezhvuz. sb. nauch. trudov. Omsk, 1994.
15. Bodriyar Zh. V teni molchalivogo bol'shinstva, ili Konec social'nogo. Ekaterinburg, 2000.
16. Fedotova V. G. Manipulyaciya kak substitut demokratii. URL: http://viperson.ru (data obrascheniya: 05.06.2017).
17. Liotar Zh.-F. Sostoyanie postmoderna. SPb., 1998.
18. Breytueyt Dzh. Prestuplenie, styd i vossoedinenie. M., 2002.
19. Luneev V. V. Epoha globalizacii i prestupnost'. M., 2007.
20. Fadeev V. N. Vnutrennie i vneshnie ugrozy bezopasnosti Rossii // Kriminologiya: vchera, segodnya, zavtra. 2016. № 4. S. 33-38.
21. Hantington S. Stolknovenie civilizaciy / per. s angl. T. Velimeeva. M., 2007.
22. Bavsun M. V. Ugolovno-pravovoe vozdeystvie: ideologiya, celi i sredstva realizacii. Omsk, 2014.
23. Hantington S. Kto my? Vyzovy amerikanskoy nacional'noy identichnosti / per. s angl. A. Bashkirova. M., 2008.
24. Kacuk N. L. Vsemirnaya enciklopediya. Filosofiya. XX vek. M.; Minsk, 2002.
25. Gilinskiy Ya. I. Deviantnost' i social'nyy kontrol' v mire postmoderna: kratkiy ocherk // Obschestvo i chelovek. 2015. № 3-4. S. 89-99.
26. Shestakov D. A. «Tolerantnoe» pravosoznanie: tyur'my dlya naroda i bezotvetstvennost' vorobogacham? // Kriminologiya: vchera, segodnya, zavtra. 2015. № 4. S. 13-17.
27. Kristi N. Udobnoe kolichestvo prestupleniy. SPb., 2006.
28. Beshenstvo printera: Gosduma stala prinimat' v tri raza bol'she zakonov. // URL: http://www.mk.ru/politics (data obrascheniya: 10.06.2017).
29. Kleymenov I. M. Sravnitel'naya kriminologiya: kriminalizaciya, prestupnost', ugolovnaya politika v usloviyah globalizacii: avtoref. dis.. d-ra. yurid. nauk. Omsk, 2015.
30. Pudovochkin Yu. E., Babaev M. M. Repressivnoe reshenie social'nyh problem: prichiny i posledstviya // Rossiyskiy kriminologicheskiy zhurnal. 2016. № 3. S. 424-425.
