In article questions of involvement of legal entities to administrative responsibility for violation of an established order of the organization or holding mass public actions are considered. Besides legal entities, the other persons equated to them by industry or special acts can be subjects of administrative responsibility also. Authors come to a conclusion: that association or the organization could be considered as the subject of administrative responsibility, they have to be registered in such quality or acquire the status of the legal entity on other legal basis. Further various approaches to determination of guilt of the legal entity in this connection the conclusion is drawn that the fault of this subject of offense has to be independent and connected with existence or lack of the fact of his exit out of limits of right capacity or violations during her realization are considered. It is necessary to consider that the legal entity can act as the organizer of the event, from his name specific people who the actions can break an established order of the organization of a public action act and it shouldn't be changed for responsibility of the legal entity.
legal persons, administrative responsibility, public events, offense, attraction
1. Yampol'skaya C. A. Sub'ekty sovetskogo administrativnogo prava: dis.. d-ra yurid. nauk. M., 1957; Petrov G. I. Sovetskie administrativno-pravovye otnosheniya. L., 1954; Venediktov A. V. O sub'ektah socialisticheskih pravootnosheniy // Sovetskoe gosudarstvo i pravo. 1955. № 6. S. 17-28.
2. Vlasov V. A. Novoe zakonodatel'stvo ob administrativnyh shtrafah. M., 1963; Koval' L. V. Administrativno-deliktnoe otnoshenie. Kiev, 1979; Sovetskoe administrativnoe pravo / pod red. A. E. Luneva. M., 1970; Yakuba O. M. Administrativnaya otvetstvennost'. M., 1972.
3. Bahrah D. N. Sovetskoe zakonodatel'stvo ob administrativnoy otvetstvennosti. Perm', 1969; Galagan I. A. Administrativnaya otvetstvennost' v SSSR. Voronezh, 1970; Novoselov V. I. Administrativnaya otvetstvennost' yuridicheskih lic // Sovetskaya yusticiya, 1981, № 23. S. 10-11.
4. Pankova O. V. Nastol'naya kniga sud'i po delam ob administrativnyh pravonarusheniyah. M., 2010.
5. Havin A. L. Yuridicheskoe lico v proizvodstve po delam ob administrativnyh pravonarusheniyah: dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. M., 2010.
6. Minashkin A. V. Problemy administrativnoy otvetstvennosti yuridicheskih lic // Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava. 1998. № 7. S. 45-53; Venediktov A. V. O sub'ektah socialisticheskih pravootnosheniy // Sovetskoe gosudarstvo i pravo. 1995. № 6. S. 17-28.
7. Otchet o rabote sudov obschey yurisdikcii po rassmotreniyu del ob administrativnyh pravonarusheniyah № 1-AP za 2016 god // Oficial'nyy sayt Sudebnogo departamenta pri Verhovnom sude Rossiyskoy Federacii. URL: http:// www.cdep.ru (data obrascheniya 23.08.2017 g.).
8. Petrov M. P. Administrativnaya otvetstvennost' organizaciy (yuridicheskih lic): avtoref. dis.. kand. yurid. nauk. Saratov, 1998; Viktorov I. Administrativnaya otvetstvennost' yuridicheskih lic // Zakonnost'. 2001, № 6. S. 46-47.
9. Ovcharova E. V. Administrativnaya otvetstvennost' yuridicheskih lic: avtoref. dis.. kand. yurid. nauk. M., 2001.
10. Panov A. B. Administrativnaya otvetstvennost' yuridicheskih lic: monogr. M., 2013.
11. Kolesnichenko Yu. Yu. Nekotorye aspekty viny yuridicheskih lic, privlekaemyh k administrativnoy otvetstvennosti // Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava. 2003. № 1. S. 76-81.
12. Kommentariy k Kodeksu Rossiyskoy Federacii ob administrativnyh pravonarusheniyah / pod red. V. V. Chernikova. M., 2002.
13. Sorokin V. D. KoAP RF i klassicheskoe ponimanie viny kak osnovaniya administrativnoy otvetstvennosti // Administrativnoe i administrativno-processual'noe pravo. Aktual'nye problemy. M., 2004.
