Active participation of the Russian Federation in the international actions, including as their organizer which carrying out requires considerable spatial basis, predetermined need of creation of the accurate debugged mechanism of withdrawal of objects of private property for the state needs. The overall performance of this mechanism is caused by creation of such conditions under which the rights and legitimate interests of all participants of such relations would be observed. In article some legal problems of withdrawal of objects of private property for the state and municipal needs are investigated. Authors analyzed not only the domestic legislation and court practice, but also experience of the leading foreign countries in the sphere of the termination of an ownership right according to the procedure of withdrawal of property for the state and municipal needs is considered. The attention not only on positive, but also is paid to the negative moments in practice of foreign countries on withdrawal of a private fast estate for the state needs. Special attention is paid to problems of determination of the amount of compensation to individuals whose property is subject to withdrawal in favor of the state.
ownership right, termination of an ownership right, withdrawal, state and municipal needs, compensation
1. Alekseeva A. P. Prestupnost' v sfere professional'nogo sporta: kriminologicheskoe issledovanie: monogr. Volgograd: Volgogradskaya akademiya MVD Rossii, 2010.
2. Alekseeva A. P. Sportivnaya kriminologiya: monogr. Volgograd: Volgogradskaya akademiya MVD Rossii, 2014.
3. Kommentariy k Zemel'nomu kodeksu Rossiyskoy Federacii (postateynyy) / pod red. S. A. Bogolyubova. 2-e izd, pererab. i dop. M.: Prospekt, 2011.
4. Ryzhenkov A. Ya. O nekotoryh problemah iz'yatiya zemel'nyh uchastkov dlya gosudarstvennyh i municipal'nyh nuzhd v Rossii: problemy teorii i praktiki // Biznes. Obrazovanie. Pravo. Vestnik Volgogradskogo instituta biznesa. 2015. № 3. S. 228-232.
5. Edemskiy A. A. Mezhdunarodnaya praktika opredeleniya kompensaciy za izymaemye dlya gosudarstvennyh nuzhd zemel'nye uchastki // Izvestiya Rossiyskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta im. A. I. Gercena. 2009. № 96. S. 86-90.
6. Golovanov K. P. Iz'yatie zemel'nyh uchastkov dlya gosudarstvennyh i municipal'nyh nuzhd - problemy pravovogo regulirovaniya // Imuschestvennye otnosheniya v Rossiyskoy Federacii. 2013. № 10. S. 110-114.
7. Zav'yalov A. A. O principah kompensacii ubytkov sobstvennikam zemel'nyh uchastkov pri ih iz'yatii dlya gosudarstvennyh nuzhd // Voprosy imuschestvennoy politiki. 2010. № 5. S. 53-57.
8. Opredelenie Verhovnogo Suda RF ot 14.02.2017 po delu № 306-ES16-9944, A55-5004/2014. Dostup iz sprav.-pravovoy sistemy «Konsul'tantPlyus».
9. Afanas'eva S. D. Nekotorye problemy instituta iz'yatiya zemel' dlya publichnyh celey (Eminent domain) v SShA // Vserossiyskiy nauchnyy zhurnal «Voprosy pravovedeniya». 2013. № 4. S. 420-421.
10. Eminent domain takings for private development. URL: http://landownerattorneys.com/blog (data obrascheniya 21.07.2017).
11. Walsh C. Kelo case - a home lost for what??? URL: https://thatwoman.wordpress.com/category/eminent-domain/ (data obrascheniya 21.07.2017).
12. Hathaway J. Reevaluating Eminent Domain’s Benefits Necessary for Economic Success. URL: http://www.insidesources.com (data obrascheniya 21.07.2017).
13. Anisimova T. V. Issledovanie sistemy cennostey podsudimogo kak sposob ob'yasneniya motivov prestupleniya // Obschestvo i chelovek. 2011. № 1 (2). S. 12-14.
14. Anisimova T. V. Naznachenie cennostnogo argumenta v sisteme sudebnoy argumentacii // Aktual'nye problemy filologii i pedagogicheskoy lingvistiki / pod red. T. Yu. Tamer'yan. 2008. № 10 S. 78-83.
