The relevance of the presented article is that when analyzing foreign experience in countering cybercrime, there are contradictory provisions of national legislative systems. According to different criteria, types of computer crimes are assessed and strategies for ensuring cybersecurity are being developed, there is no single regulatory document, and the accumulated experience in this field is informative, which makes it possible to carry out an analysis of the fight against cybercrime, taking into account various supranational legal systems. The conclusion is substantiated that it is necessary to evaluate the implementation of the normative content of ensuring cybersecurity in different countries. Without fixing in the normative documentation of a certain conceptual apparatus, it is impossible to create a full-fledged security structure. The scientific article aims to study various approaches to the construction of general and special norms for the legal support of countering cybercrime and to reflect those valuable moments that should be used in the domestic regulatory field.
cybercrime, cybersecurity, strategy against cybercrime, information technology, convention, national cyberspace
1. Prostoserdov M. A. Ekonomicheskie prestupleniya, sovershaemye v kiberprostranstve, i mery protivodeystviya im: dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. M., 2016. 232 s.
2. Kiberbezopasnost' i upravlenie internetom: dokumenty i materialy dlya rossiyskih regulyatorov i ekspertov / otv. red. M. B. Kasenova; sost. O. V. Demidov i M. B. Kasenova. M.: Statut, 2013. 464 s.
3. Egorov I. Yuriy Chayka rasskazal o bor'be s internet-prestupnost'yu // Ros. gaz. 2017. № 7356 (190).
4. Pechnikov N. P. Problemy teorii i praktiki prokurorskogo nadzora za processual'noy deyatel'nost'yu organov predvaritel'nogo sledstviya // Voprosy sovremennoy nauki i praktiki. Universitet im. V. I. Vernadskogo. 2012. № 38. S. 101-105.
5. Kazarin O. V, Tarasov A. A. Sovremennye koncepcii kiberbezopasnosti veduschih zarubezhnyh gosudarstv // Vestnik RGGU. Seriya «Dokumentovedenie i arhivovedenie. Informatika. Zaschita informacii i informacionnaya bezopasnost'». 2013. № 2. S. 58-63.
6. Medvedeva S. V., Mentyukova M. A. Osobennosti klassifikacii i sostava obstoyatel'stv, isklyuchayuschih pravovuyu otvetstvennost' lichnosti // Voprosy sovremennoy nauki i praktiki. Universitet im. V. I. Vernadskogo. 2015. № 1 (55). S. 150.
7. Electronic Communications Privacy Act of 1986, ECPA. URL: http://dorothy.as.arizona.edu/ LAW/ ref5.html (data obrascheniya 05.02.2018).
8. The National Strategy to Secure Cyberspace. URL: http://www.whitehouse.gov/pcipb/ (data obrascheniya 05.02.2018).
9. Gosudarstvennye strategii kiberbezopasnosti. URL: https://www.securitylab.ru (data obrascheniya 05.02.2018).
10. Germany passes strict cyber-security law to protect «critical infrastructure». URL: https:// www.rt.com/news (data obrascheniya 05.02.2018).
11. Volevodz A. G. Protivodeystvie komp'yuternym prestupleniyam: pravovye osnovy mezhdunarodnogo sotrudnichestva. M.: Yurlitinform, 2001. 496 c.
12. Sayt Soveta Evropy. URL: https: // search.coe.int (data obrascheniya 22.01.2018).
13. Zheludkov M. A. Osobennosti realizacii v Rossii mezhdunarodnogo opyta po zaschite ot korystnyh prestupleniy, sovershaemyh v kiberprostranstve // Vestnik ekonomicheskoy bezopasnosti. 2016. № 5. S. 191-195.
14. Ozhegov S. I., Shvedova N. Yu. Tolkovyy slovar' russkogo yazyka. M.: Az', 1992. URL: http://lib.ru /DIC/OZHEGOW (data obrascheniya 22.01.2018).
15. Informacionnyy resurs «China Space». URL: http://www.chinaspace.ru (data obrascheniya: 06.01.2013).
