The article deals with the reasons of violations of the criminal-procedural legislation as well as of the needs for normative fixation of the principle of objectivity in the preliminary investigation. The author also proves the necessity to observe the principle of objectivity in the criminal-procedural activity, if this principle won’t work, this can lead to: formalization of the criminal process, preconception in proving, subjectivism while taking procedural decisions related to the criminal case, adjudging persons to be guilty a priori in the investigators, prosecutors and judges’ actions, conducting superficial investigations as well as increasing the number of investigative and judicial mistakes. The author of the article argues the exclusion by the legislator of the norms of the criminal procedure law of the principle of objectivity of the preliminary investigation, subjectivism can have a negative influence on the course and results of the criminal-procedural activity. The author concludes that it is the objectivity of the criminal-procedural activity as the principle of the criminal procedure that can have positive influence on the quality of the preliminary investigation preventing investigative and judicial arbitrary treatment as well as the application of the law at his own and sole discretion, and violation of human rights and freedoms.
criminal-procedural activity, principles of the criminal procedure, principle of objectivity in the criminal process, objectivity of evidence estimation, subjectivism, procedural decisions
1. Spravochnaya statisticheskaya informaciya FKU «GIAC MVD Rossii» po sostoyaniyu na 05.04.2018.
2. Konvencii o zaschite prav cheloveka i osnovnyh svobod ETS № 005 (Rim, 4 noyabrya 1950 g.), ratificirovana Rossiey 30 marta 1998 g.; Mezhdunarodnyy pakt o grazhdanskih i politicheskih pravah (N'yu-York, 16 dekabrya 1966 g.), ratificirovan Ukazom Prezidiuma VS SSSR 18 sentyabrya 1973 g. URL: http://www.base.garant.ru/ 2540800/ (data obrascheniya: 30.03.2018).
3. Pechnikov G. A. Dialekticheskie problemy istiny v ugolovnom processe: avtoref. dis. … d-ra yurid. nauk: 12.00.09. Volgograd, 2005. 49 s.
4. Obobschenie praktiki rassmotreniya sudami Volgogradskoy oblasti hodataystv organov predvaritel'nogo rassledovaniya v poryadke st. 106-109 UPK RF za 2017 g.: utv. postanovleniem Prezidiuma Volgogradskogo oblastnogo suda ot 14.02.2018. URL: www:http://oblsud. vol.sudrf.ru (data obrascheniya: 05.04.2018).
5. Lupinskaya P. A. Resheniya v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve: teoriya, zakonodatel'stvo, praktika. 2-e izd., pererab. i dop. M.: Norma-Infra-M, 2010. 240 s.
6. Ugolovno-processual'nyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federacii ot 18.12.2001 № 174-FZ (red. ot 23.04.2018). URL: http://www.consultant.ru (data obrascheniya: 10.05.2018).
7. Kaneman D., Slovik P., Tverski A. Prinyatie resheniy v neopredelennosti: Pravila i predubezhdeniya. Har'kov: In-t prikladnoy psihologii «Gumanitarnyy Centr», 2005. 632 s.
8. Sheyfer S. A. Rossiyskiy sledovatel' - issledovatel' ili presledovatel'? // Rossiyskaya yusticiya. 2010. № 11. S. 34-36.
9. Sheyfer S. A. Dokazatel'stva i dokazyvanie po ugolovnym delam: problemy teorii i pravovogo regulirovaniya: monogr. M.: Norma, 2009. 175 s.
10. Azarov V. A., Revenko N. I., Kuzembaeva M. M. Funkciya predvaritel'nogo rassledovaniya v istorii, teorii i praktike ugolovnogo processa Rossii: monogr. Omsk: Izd-vo OmGU, 2006. 560 s.
11. Garmaev Yu. Vsestoronnost' i polnota rassledovaniya // Zakonnost'. 2002. № 9. S. 6-9.
12. Kudryavcev V. L. Ugolovnoe sudoproizvodstvo kak sfera osoboy zaschity konstitucionnyh prav i zakonnyh interesov cheloveka i grazhdanina // Advokat. 2008. № 9. S. 12-19.
13. Himicheva G. P. Dosudebnoe proizvodstvo po ugolovnym delam (Koncepciya sovershenstvovaniya ugolovno-processual'noy deyatel'nosti): dis.. d-ra yurid. nauk. M., 2003. 399 s.
14. Solnceva N. Princip-nevidimka v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve // Zakonnost'. 2003. № 5. S. 37-38.
15. Romanov S. V. Trebovanie vsestoronnosti, polnoty i ob'ektivnosti issledovaniya obstoyatel'stv dela kak neobhodimoe uslovie predvaritel'nogo rassledovaniya // Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 11. Pravo. 2008. № 1. S. 18-37.
16. Isaenko V. N. Ocenka prokurorom vsestoronnosti, polnoty i ob'ektivnosti rezul'tatov predvaritel'nogo rassledovaniya // Probely v rossiyskom zakonodatel'stve. 2013. № 1. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru (data obrascheniya: 19.04.2018).
17. Bekon F. Velikoe vosstanovlenie nauk // Cit. po: Istoriya politicheskih i pravovyh ucheniy: uchebnik dlya vuzov / pod obsch. red. akad. RAN, d. yu. n., prof. V. S. Nersesyanca. 4-e izd., pererab. i dop. M.: Norma, 2004. 944 s.
