REQUIREMENT ON REMEDIAL ACTION REGARDING LAW VIOLATION IS AN EFFICIENT TOOL OF PROCURATOR'S SUPERVISION IN PRE-TRIAL PROCEDURE?
Abstract and keywords
Abstract (English):
This article reviews problems regarding the efficiency of procurator's supervision in pre-trial procedure on criminal cases. It is emphasized that during pre-trial procedure the procurator, while exercising supervision over observing the law by preliminary investigation bodies, is entitled to demand elimination of existing violations. The author, having analyzed the statistics, identifies a trend of more frequent demands by procurators, within the framework of their monitoring, to eliminate violations of the legislation based on p. 3, part 2, clause 37 of the Russian Code of Criminal Procedure. The scientific novelty is in analyzing here problematic aspects of regulations, regarding procurator's authorities in exercising procurator's supervision. The legislator has adopted a contradictory and inefficient procedure of reviewing procurator's demands in case of disagreement on the part of investigator or inquiry officer, reducing thus the potential of ensuring rights and legal interests of participants in the criminal procedure. A conclusion is drawn that the procurator does not possess necessary tools to exercise good quality supervision, making it necessary to provide for more detailed consolidation of authorities and broader means of procurator's monitoring while identifying various violations of the law by preliminary investigation bodies.

Keywords:
procurator's authorities, procurator's activities, demand to eliminate law violations, means of procurator's monitoring, procurator supervision, pre-trial procedure
Text
Text (PDF): Read Download
References

1. Dikarev I. S. Spornye voprosy organizacii dosudebnogo proizvodstva po ugolovnym delam // Rossiyskaya yusticiya. 2016. № 5. S. 28-29.

2. Dikarev I. S. Chetvertyy povod dlya vozbuzhdeniya ugolovnogo dela // Zakonnost'. 2012. № 3. S. 53-55.

3. Belyaev V. P. Nadzornaya i inye funkcii prokuratury - sovmestimy li oni? // Rossiyskiy sledovatel'. 2006. № 4. S. 49-54.

4. Haliulin A. G. Ugolovnoe presledovanie kak funkciya prokuratury Rossiyskoy Federacii (problemy osuschestvleniya v usloviyah pravovoy reformy): avtoref. dis.. d-ra yurid. nauk. M., 1997. 36 s.

5. Tushev A. A. Prokuror v ugolovnom processe Rossiyskoy Federacii: sistema funkciy i polnomochiy: dis.. d-ra yurid. nauk. Krasnodar, 2006. 384 s.

6. Kryukov V. F. Pravovoy status prokurora v ugolovnom presledovanii (dosudebnoe i sudebnoe proizvodstvo): avtoref. dis.. d-ra yurid. nauk. M., 2012. 51 s.

7. Himicheva O. V. Konceptual'nye osnovy processual'nogo kontrolya i nadzora na dosudebnyh stadiyah ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva: dis.. d-ra yurid. nauk. M., 2004. 402 s.

8. Grinenko A. V. Ugolovno-processual'nyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federacii. Postateynyy nauchno-prakticheskiy kommentariy: ucheb. posobie. M.: Prospekt, 2017. 1006 s.

9. General'naya prokuratura Rossiyskoy Federacii: ofic. sayt. URL: www.genproc.gov.ru/ smi/news/genproc/news-1425566/ (data obrascheniya: 02.11.2018).

10. Apellyacionnoe postanovlenie suda apellyacionnoy instancii po ugolovnym delam Verhovnogo suda Respubliki Dagestan № 22K-864/2018 ot 23 maya 2018 g. po delu № 22K-864/2018 // Sudebnye i normativnye akty Rossiyskoy Federacii: ofic. sayt. URL: http:/ /sudact.ru/regular/doc/6TpsSTNc6YQX/ (data obrascheniya: 12.10.2018).

11. Reshenie Tyumenskogo oblastnogo suda № 3A-61/2018 3A-61/2018-M-59/2018 M-59/2018 ot 30 maya 2018 g. po delu № 3A-61/2018 // Sudebnye i normativnye akty Rossiyskoy Federacii: ofic. sayt. URL: http://sudact.ru/regular/doc/ 6TpsSTNc6YQX/ (data obrascheniya: 18.10.2018).

12. Sychev D. A. Soderzhanie i realizaciya prokurorom funkciy nadzora i ugolovnogo presledovaniya v dosudebnyh stadiyah ugolovnogo processa: dis.. kand. yurid. nauk. M., 2016. 318 s.

13. Aktual'nye problemy prokurorskoy deyatel'nosti: kurs lekciy / pod red. O. S. Kapinus. M.: Prospekt, 2016. 186 s.

14. Serebryannikova M. V. Prokurorskiy nadzor za ugolovno-processual'noy deyatel'nost'yu organov, osuschestvlyayuschih predvaritel'noe rassledovanie: dis.. kand. yurid. nauk. M., 2013. 203 s.

15. Prigorscha P. A. Trebovanie prokurora kak sredstvo obespecheniya ispolneniya zakona: teoreticheskie i prakticheskie aspekty: dis.. kand. yurid. nauk. Ekaterinburg, 2011. 166 s.

16. Terehin A. A. Akty prokurorskogo reagirovaniya v rossiyskom ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve: dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. Omsk, 2013. 257 s.

Login or Create
* Forgot password?