employee
Volgograd, Volgograd region., Volgograd, Russian Federation
Based on the positions previously expressed in the author's scientific publications about the essence of the category of "knowledgeable persons", the article analyzes the conceptual approaches to the basic aspects of the criminal procedural doctrine of special knowledge outlined in the doctoral dissertation of E. P. Grishina. The author examines some misconceptions about the assessment of this scientist of the historical facts of the use of special knowledge, criticizes the understanding as a forensic examination of cases of participation of knowledgeable persons in the legal processes of the XIV century. When analyzing the definition of knowledgeable persons developed by E. P. Grishina, the author draws attention to the inadmissibility of singling out psychologists, doctors and teachers as independent participants in the criminal process. It is proved that these knowledgeable persons act as special cases of participation in the criminal procedural proving of specialists. It is argued that the category of "knowledgeable persons", by its very nature, is a universal term with a broad meaning and is not limited to extending exclusively to criminal procedural relations.
SPECIAL KNOWLEDGE, KNOWLEDGEABLE PERSONS, CATEGORICAL APPARATUS, SPECIALIST, THE DOCTRINE OF SPECIAL KNOWLEDGE, THE LEGAL INSTITUTE OF A SPECIALIST, THE LEGAL INSTITUTE OF FORENSIC EXAMINATION
1. Grishina E. P. The concept of using special knowledge in the context of the implementation of public and private principles of Russian criminal proceedings. Dissertation of doctor of juridical sciences. Yekaterinburg; 2024: 481. (In Russ.).
2. Makhov V. N. The use of knowledge of knowledgeable persons in the investigation of crimes. A monograph. Moscow: RUDN Publishing House; 2000: 296. (In Russ.).
3. Raimzhanova N. A. Normative regulation of the use of special knowledge in the criminal procedure legislation of the Kyrgyz Republic and the Russian Federation. Dissertation of candidate of juridical sciences. Volgograd; 2015: 263. (In Russ.).
4. Dyakonova O. G. Special knowledge in judicial and other jurisdictional activities of the EAEU Member States: theory and practice. Dissertation of doctor of juridical sciences. Moscow; 2021: 647. (In Russ.).
5. Semenov E. A., Vasyukov V. F., Volevodz A. G. The legal status and legal regulation of a specialist's participation in criminal proceedings: theoretical, procedural and organizational aspects. A monograph. Red. by A. G. Volevodz. Moscow: MGIMO University; 2020: 227. (In Russ.).
6. Zaitseva E. A. Controversial aspects of identification of the procedural status of a teacher and psychologist in criminal proceedings. Forensic Examination, 5–18, 2019. (In Russ.).
7. Orlov Yu. K. A specialist is a knowledgeable person who is not interested in the outcome of a case. Russian justice, 36–37, 2003. (In Russ.).
8. Zaitseva E. A. The scientific heritage of Yu. K. Orlov and the categorical apparatus of the doctrine of knowledgeable persons. In: Theory and practice of forensic examination in modern conditions. Proceedings of the VI International scientific and practical conference dedicated to the memory of honored lawyer of the Russian Federation, doctor of law, professor Yuri Kuzmich Orlov, Moscow, 19–20 January, 2017. Moscow: Prospekt; 2017: 149–153. (In Russ.).
