employee from 01.01.2022 until now
Novosibirsk, Russian Federation
UDC 343.98
The article examines the objects of forensic examination presented in digital form. The necessity of classifying such objects based on the method of reflection, the method of introduction into the computer environment, the form of presentation, and internal content is established. The peculiarity of existence in digital form is noted, which applies not only to objects of computer-technical expertise but also to objects of other expertises (portrait, phonoscopic, video-technical, traceological, and others). An opinion is expressed on the need to mandatory consider a digital object as a system comprising an information object, the form of information storage on a medium, and the storage medium itself. This approach allows for distinguishing between objects submitted for expert examination and the direct objects of research. It is noted that for solving tasks related to establishing the facts of digital object simulation, their classification according to the method of creation and recording into the computer environment is of paramount importance. Objects created both directly by a user and without their direct involvement (a product of using a neural network, artificial intelligence) are identified.
DIGITAL OBJECT, DIGITAL TRACE, CLASSIFICATION OF DIGITAL OBJECTS FOR EXAMINATION, INFORMATION STORAGE FORMAT, INFORMATION OBJECT, OBJECT OF RESEARCH, COMPUTER SIMULATION, NEURAL NETWORK OUTPUT
1. Usov A. I., Omel’yanyuk G. G., Lapina I. A. (et al.) The role of digital transformation in the development of forensic science. Theory and practice of forensic science, 47–57, 2024. (In Russ.).
2. Rossinskaya E. R. The system of forensic activity digitalization theory. Theory and practice of forensic science, 20–32, 2024. (In Russ.).
3. Rossinskaya E. R. Vector of development of professional competencies of a forensic expert in the context of a private theory of digitalization of forensic activities. In: Forensic examination: past, present and view to the future. Materials of an International scientific and practical conference, 13 May 2022, Saint Petersburg. Reds. G. V. Paramonova, V. P. Yaremchuk. Saint Petersburg; 2022: 211–216. (In Russ).
4. Skripko V. A. Classification of computer data relevant to forensic analysis. Bulletin of the institute of law of Bashkir State University, 187–197, 2025. (In Russ.).
5. Usov A. I., Karpukhina E. S., Kuznetsov V. O. Some aspects of applying a systematic approach to the study of the objects of forensic examination. Theory and practice of forensic science, 6–17, 2022. (In Russ.).
6. Belkin R. S. Forensic encyclopedia. 2nd ed., add. Moscow: Megatron-XXI; 2000: 333. (In Russ.).
7. Edzhubov L. G. The objects of forensic examination. In: Multimodal edition "Forensic science. Reboot". Part 2. Dictionary of forensic science. Red. S. A. Smirnova. Moscow: Ekom; 2012: 434–439. (In Russ.).
8. Rossinskaya E. R., Galyashina E. I., Zinin A. M. Theory of forensic examination (forensic expertology). Textbook. Red. by E. R. Rossinskaya. 2nd ed., rev. and suppl. Moscow: Norma; INFRA-M; 2019: 368. (In Russ.).
9. Arsenyev V. D. Correlation of the concepts of the subject and object of the theory of forensic examination. In: Collection of scientific works. Issue 44. Moscow; 1980. (In Russ.).
10. Sharov V. I. To the concept of the object of forensic examination. Forensic Examination, 29–35, 2023. (In Russ.).
11. Chelysheva O. V. The problems of objects of a forensic examination. Journal of economic security, 118–120, 2016. (In Russ.).
12. Vehov V. B. "Electronic forensics": concept and system. In: Criminalistics: current issues of theory and practice. Proceedings of the International scientific-practical conference, Rostov-on-Don, 25 May 2017. Rostov-on-Don: RUI of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia; 2017: 40–46. (In Russ.).
13. Usov A. I., Edjubov L. G., Karpukhina E. S. Expert research of computer imitation. Theory and practice of forensic science, 10–17, 2011. (In Russ.).
