Real position of the negative impact on the interests of justice is analyzed in the given article. On the basis of the sociological research, the author makes a conclusion related to the increased level of latent state of a number of crimes against justice. The absence of practice to apply rules of law to impose criminal responsibility for these crimes commission affects the effectiveness of the protection of interests of justice in a negative way. The author examines the causes and conditions that determine the high level of latent nature of the analyzed crimes. Latent nature of such crimes gives the involved (and responsible for their commission) persons an opportunity to consider their impunity. For its part the latter is believed to be one of the main factors of criminality to contribute to new crimes commission related to encroachment on the interests of justice. The author identifies a number of topical problems and offers possible variants to solve them, while analyzing criminal legislation in Russia and law enforcement practice.
crimes against justice, latent nature, efficiency of criminal law protection, encroachment, factors of criminality
1. Akutaev R. M. Neyubileynye razmyshleniya kriminologa o realizacii otdel'nyh polozheniy Konstitucii Rossiyskoy Federacii // Yuridicheskiy vestnik DGU. 2013. № 4. S. 15-17.
2. Luneev V. V. Prestupnost' XX veka. Mirovye, regional'nye i rossiyskie tendencii. Izd. 2-e, pererab. i dop. M.: Volters Kluver, 2005. 912 s.
3. Savyuk L. V. Pravovaya statistika. M.: Yurist', 1999. 588 s.
4. Kvashis V. E. Sravnitel'nyy analiz latentnoy prestupnosti v Rossii i zarubezhnyh stranah: problemy i perspektivy // Zhurnal zarubezhnogo zakonodatel'stva i sravnitel'nogo pravovedeniya. 2016. № 5. S. 89-93.
5. Postanovlenie Prezidiuma Verhovnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federacii ot 13 oktyabrya 2010 g. № 222P10. Dostup iz sprav.-pravovoy sistemy «Konsul'tantPlyus».
6. Teoreticheskie osnovy issledovaniya i analiza latentnoy prestupnosti: monogr. / pod red. S. M. Inshakova. M.: YuNITI-DANA: Zakon i pravo, 2012. 839 s.
7. Zerenkov E. V. Ugolovno-pravovye i kriminologicheskie aspekty podkupa i prinuzhdeniya k lzhesvidetel'stvu i ukloneniyu ot dachi pokazaniy: dis.. kand. yurid. nauk. Stavropol': Stavropol'. gos. un-t, 1999. 157 s.
8. Gorelik A. S., Lobanova L. V. Prestupleniya protiv pravosudiya. SPb. : Yuridicheskiy centr Press, 2005. 491 s.
9. Imamutdinov A. F. Ugroza ili nasil'stvennye deystviya v svyazi s osuschestvleniem pravosudiya ili proizvodstvom predvaritel'nogo rassledovaniya: ugolovno-pravovye i kriminologicheskie aspekty: dis.. kand. yurid. nauk. Chelyabinsk: Chelyabinskiy gos. un-t, 2010. 242 s.
10. Radchenko A. A. Prestupnye posyagatel'stva na uchastnikov processa dokazyvaniya: problemy kvalifikacii i zakonodatel'noy reglamentacii: avtoref. dis.. kand. yurid. nauk. Vladivostok: Dal'nevostochnyy gos. un-t, 2010. 27 s.
11. Terehova E. N. Ugolovno-pravovaya ohrana zhizni i zdorov'ya lic, osuschestvlyayuschih pravosudie ili predvaritel'noe rassledovanie: avtoref. dis.. kand. yurid. nauk. M.: Akademiya General'noy prokuratury Rossiyskoy Federacii, 2011. 26 s.
12. Ugolovnoe delo № 049327 // Arhiv prokuratury Krasnoarmeyskogo rayona g. Volgograda.
13. Kassacionnoe opredelenie Verhovnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federacii ot 18 aprelya 2011 g. № 4-O11-57. Dostup iz sprav.-pravovoy sistemy «Konsul'tantPlyus».
