graduate student from 01.01.2023 until now
Podols'k, Moscow, Russian Federation
UDC 343.9
The article examines the key aspects of the methodology for evaluating expert opin-ions in cases involving crimes under articles 228, 2281 and 234 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation. Particular attention is paid to the relevance, admissibility and reliability of expert conclusions as evidence in criminal proceedings. The author analyzes the criteria that determine the quality and validity of expert findings, as well as identifies potential errors and violations that may occur during the examination process. The role of the defense attorney in evaluating expert opinions is explored, including the use of specialized knowledge, analysis of expert methodologies and formulating arguments to challenge expert conclusions. The article provides practi-cal recommendations for developing a methodology that enables defense attorneys to effectively analyze and dispute expert opinions. The materials presented in the article may be useful for lawyers, attorneys, investigators and specialists in the field of criminal law and forensic examination, aiming to improve the quality of defense for the accused and the objectivity of judicial proceedings.
defender, illicit trafficking, narcotic drugs, psychotropic or potent substances, forensic examination, expert opinion, evaluation of expert opinion.
1. Gadzhiev V. E. Features of preventive work in criminal cases related to drug trafficking. Russian investigator, 53–56, 2018. (In Russ.).
2. Kozlov S. N., Rozentsvaig A. I. Forensic examination in the arsenal of a de-fense lawyer. Bulletin of the Samara Law Institute, 72–79, 2010 (In Russ.); Ishmae-va T. P. Assessment of the admissibility of an expert's opinion on criminal cases. Management in modern systems, 28–31, 2017. (In Russ.).
3. Strogovich M. S. The course of the Soviet criminal process. Moscow: Publish-ing house of the USSR Academy of Sciences; 1958: 703 (In Russ.).
4. Belkin A. R. Theory of evidence in criminal proceedings. Moscow: Norma; 2005: 528. (In Russ.).
5. Sorkin V. S. Evidence and proof in criminal proceedings (theoretical and legal aspects). Monograph. Moscow: Grodno; 2017: 123. (In Russ.).
6. Ulyanova L. T. The subject of evidence and proof in criminal proceedings. Moscow: Gorodets; 2008: 176. (In Russ.); Ishmaeva T. P. On the issue of the legal properties of evidence in criminal proceedings. Bulletin of Chelyabinsk State Univer-sity, 133–136, 2015. (In Russ.).
7. Shafer S. A. Evidence and proof in criminal cases: problems of theory and le-gal regulation. Monograph. Moscow: Norma; 2024: 240. (In Russ.).
8. Litvinova I. V. The grounds and procedure for the prosecutor's decision to de-clare evidence inadmissible. Textbook. Irkutsk: Irkutsk Law Institute of the General Prosecutor's Office of the Russian Federation; 2003: 25. (In Russ.).
9. Dmitrieva L. V. Typical expert errors and ways to solve them. Vestnik of Mos-cow University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia, 49–51, 2017. (In Russ.).
10. Pavlov R. K. A sample of a petition for the recognition of a chemical and pharmacological examination of narcotic drugs as invalid. Available from: https://zakon.ru/discussion/2015/04/22/obrazec_xodatajstva_o_priznanii_ximikofarmakologicheskoj_ekspertizy_narkotikov_nedejstvitelnoj. Accessed: 13 June 2024. (In Russ.).
11. Kudryavtseva A. V. Expertise in the criminal process of Russia. Chelyabinsk: Publishing House of Ural State University; 2001: 411. (In Russ.); Nemira S. V. Reli-ability of expert opinion in criminal proceedings. Dissertation of candidate of juridical sciences. Krasnodar; 2016: 207. (In Russ.).
12. Nemira S. V. Interrogation of an expert as a way to verify his authenticity. Society and law, 2012. Available from: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/dopros-eksperta-kak-sposob-proverki-ego-dostovernosti. Accessed: 20 November 2024. (In Russ.).
13. Korukhov Yu. G. Reliability of expert opinion and improvement of its assess-ment. Questions of the theory of forensic examination and improvement of the activi-ties of forensic expert institutions. Collection of scientific papers. Moscow: All-Russian Forensic Research Institute; 1986: 4–27. (In Russ.).
