Autonomous Nonprofit Organization Scientific Research Center for Information Technologies in the Museum (direktor)
Autonomous non-profit organization "Non-governmental forensic expertise of the Novosibirsk region" (director)
Novosibirsk, Russian Federation
This article discusses some typical activity errors in forensic construction and technical expertise related to objective reasons for the discrepancy between the applied standards and the goals and objectives of forensic expertise. If in all areas of forensic expert activity there is a lack of reference methods and special standards, then in construction and technical expertise the standards of the technical regulation system for general construction purposes are used. The system of construction regulation in the Russian Federation is unique and is distinguished by its completeness, scientific elaboration and a huge volume of existing norms and rules covering all areas of construction activity. But, at the same time, this system of technical norms and methods is designed to ensure the quality of construction by all available means, which coincides with the goal and objectives of forensic expertise only partially. Differences in goal setting create the basis for the emergence of typical errors in expert opinions in the content of construction methods and standards. The author provides an analysis of scientific literature with an assessment of causality both in forensic practice in general and in construction and technical expertise in particular. As an effective measure to prevent and eliminate this type of typical error, it is proposed to reformat the current general construction system of regulatory control into a special forensic system of standards.
Typical errors, forensic construction and technical expertise, causes of typical errors, forensic standards.
1. Belkin R.S. Forensic Science: Problems, Trends, Prospects. From Theory to Practice. – M.: 1998. – 83 p.
2. Belkin R.S. Forensic Science Course. A Textbook for Universities in 3 Volumes. – M.: Jurist Publishing House, 1997. – 464 p.
3. Rosinskaya E.R. Handbook of the Judge. Forensic Science / E.R. Rosinskaya, E.I. Galyashina. – M.: Mir, 2016.
4. Forensic Science: Typical Mistakes / edited by E.R. Rossinskaya. – M.: Prospect, 2018. – 544 p.
5. Mazur E.S., Ivanov I.V. On Possible Errors in Expert Opinions // Vestn. Tomsk. state University. 2014. No. 387. P. 164-169.
6. Rossinskaya E.R. Gnoseological and activity-based expert errors in the use of modern technologies in forensic examinations // Bulletin of the Moscow University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia. 2015. No. 3. P. 18-22.
7. Khrustalev V.N. Are the causes of expert errors really numerous? // Modern problems of criminalistics and forensic examination: Materials of the All-Russian scientific and practical conference. - Saratov: FGBOU HPE "Saratov State University named after N.G. Chernyshevsky", 2014. - P. 3-8.
8. Khrustalev V.N. How to ensure the reliability of evidence obtained through expertise? // Forensic examination. - 2016. Issue. 3 (47). P. 156-171.
9. Slabkaya D.N., Novikov A.V. On the issue of expert errors (mistakes) in civil and criminal proceedings // Issues of Russian and International Law. 2019. Vol. 9. No. 4A. P. 274-282.
10. Paramonova G.V. Causes of expert errors and ways to prevent them // Bulletin of the Moscow University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia. 2015. No. 3. P. 57-59.
11. Perepechina I.O. Expert errors in the context of professional activities of experts // Bulletin of the Moscow University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia. 2015. No. 3. P. 34-36.
12. Bushuev V.V. Expert errors: causes and prevention // Bulletin of the Moscow University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia. 2015. No. 3. P. 23-26.
13. Aminev F.G., Kuchin O.S. On the need for legal regulation of uniform methods of expert activity. Journal: Expert-criminalist. No. 4. Year of publication: 2020. - P. 3-6.
14. Aminev F.G. On the forensic assessment of forensic construction and technical examination. Scientific notes of the Crimean Federal State University named after V.I. Vernadsky. Legal sciences. - 2023. - V. 9 (75). No. 1. - P. 413-417].
