employee
Volgograd Academy of the Russian Internal Affairs Ministry (Department of Criminalistic technology of the educational and scientific complex of expert criminalistic activity, teacher)
employee
Volgograd Academy of the Russian Internal Affairs Ministry (Department of Criminalistic technology of the educational and scientific complex of expert criminalistic activity, teacher)
Volgograd, Volgograd, Russian Federation
This article explores the essence of standardization, viewed as an organizational and methodological mechanism for ensuring the implementation of the principle of objectivity in forensic science. The author presents the principle of objectivity as an integral element of forensic examination, and standardization as one of the most effective tools for its practical implementation. The study identifies existing intersectoral differences in the regulatory framework governing the requirements for the pro duction and presentation of expert opinions, as well as departmental methodological disunity, which leads to in comparability and insufficient reproducibility of results obtained using non-standardized tools. The article substantiates the need to introduce mandatory unified standards for the main elements of forensic science, while proposing a differentiated approach to standardization, taking into account the division of expert tasks into typical (standard) and heuristic (creative). The practical implementation of the proposed model is considered using specific methods of standardization – systematization, typification and unification, which together form a system of guarantees of objectivity, ensuring scientific verifiability, procedural certainty and methodological reproducibility of expert research. Keywords: forensic examination
forensic examination, principle of objectivity, standardization, expert methods, reproducibility of results, unification of expert procedures
1. Paramonova G. V. On the methods used in portrait examination. Encyclopedia of forensic examination, 115–121, 2017. (In Russ.).
2. Forensic examination: typical errors. Monograph. Red. by E. R. Rossinskaya. 2 nd ed., rev. and add. Moscow: Prospect; 2024: 736. (In Russ.).
3. Orlova V. F. Theory of forensic handwriting identification. In: Proceedings of the All-Russian Research Institute of Forensic Expertise. Ministry of Justice of the USSR. Iss. 6. Moscow: [S. n.]; 1973: 334. (In Russ.).
4. Aver'yanova T. V. Sudebnaya ekspertiza: Kurs obschey teorii: monografiya. Moskva: Norma: INFRA-M, 2015. 480 s. URL: https://znanium. com/read (data obrascheniya: 08.09.2026).
5. Amineva Z. F. On the issue of enshrining the concept of "technical means" in the criminal procedure law. Rule of law: theory and practice, 135–142, 2018. (In Russ.).
6. Grishin P. L., Gorin V. A. Tipovye ekspertnye metodiki issledovaniya veschestvennyh dokazatel'stv. Ch. I / pod red. kand. tehn. nauk Yu. M. Dil'dina; obsch. red. kand. tehn. nauk V. V Martynova. Moskva: EKC MVD Rossii, 2010. 568 s.
7. Chesnokova E. V. A Particular theory of standardization of forensic activity in the general theory of forensic expertology. Theory and practice of forensic examination, 46–52, 2021. (In Russ.).
8. Chesnokova E. V. Formirovanie znaniy o standartizacii v oblasti sudebnoekspertnoy deyatel'nosti v Rossii // Teoriya i praktika sudebnoy ekspertizy. 2021. T. 16, № 1. S. 141–151.
9. Moiseeva T. F. Standartizaciya sudebno-ekspertnoy deyatel'nosti v celyah ustraneniya nekotoryh processual'nyh i metodicheskih problem ee osuschestvleniya // Problemy klassifikacii sudebnyh ekspertiz, sertifikacii i validacii metodicheskogo obespecheniya, standartizacii sudebno-ekspertnoy deyatel'nosti: materialy Mezhdunar. nauch.-prakt. konf. (Moskva, 21 yanvarya 2016 g.). Moskva: Prospekt, 2016. S. 193–196.
10. Smirnova S. A., Zamaraeva N. A. Possibilities of technical regulation of forensic activity in the Russian Federation. Theory and practice of forensic examination, 46–50, 2015. (In Russ.).
11. Chesnokova E. V. Concept, principles and place in the system of forensic expertology of the private theory of standardization in forensic activity. In: Theory and practice of improving legal, scientific-methodical and informational foundations of the use of special knowledge in judicial proceedings. Materials of All-Russian scientificpractical conference with international participation, Ufa, 19 November 2020. Red. resp. F. G. Aminev. Ufa: Bashkir State University; 2020: 159–167. (In Russ.).
12. Prokofieva E. V., Prokofieva O. Yu. Comparative review of the identification capabilities of cluster, correlation and structural-linguistic analysis in pattern recognition. Forensic Examination, 99–107, 2013. (In Russ.).
