employee
Russian Federation
employee
Russian Federation
employee from 01.01.2022 to 01.01.2026
Russian Federation
UDC 347.948
UDC 343.983.25
One of the most frequent expertise questions in court of arbitration is the estimation of the volume and cost of the actually performed work. The purpose of the article is to develop a technique for programmer's labor evaluating in projects based on "1C: Enterprise 8" platform. An overview of the available methods for assessing the complexity of automated information systems has been performed. A technique using the expert estimations method and the PERT method is proposed. The source data are the type and number of configuration objects, and the corresponding number of lines of code. Both created objects and modified objects of a typical configuration are taken into account. A modification of the PERT method which makes it possible to reduce the computational complexity without reducing the accuracy of the estimation has been performed. Expert estimates of the project complexity of all configuration object types are given. A software implementation of the proposed technique is described. It automates the procedure for extracting the data of type/number configuration objects and the corresponding number of lines of code. Research methods: probability theory (concerning in beta distribution parameters), decision theory (concerning in expert estimation), a system approach (as a methodological basis). The result obtained in the form of a quantitative expert technique. It might be used for practical application in the forensic and extrajudicial investigations as a typical expert technique.
computer-technical expertise, labor cost assessment, expert estimation, expert technique, 1C:Enterprise, PERT, IT contract
1. Budnik A. V., Domakur O. V., Romanova E. S., Trukhanovich T. L. Analysis of labor cost technique for software engineering. Bulletin of connections, 36–41, 2020. (In Russ.).
2. Glazova M. A. Estimation of software project systems. Applied informatics, 12–27, 2008. (In Russ.).
3. McConell S. Software estimation: demystifying the black art. Saint Petersburg: Russkaya redakcia; Piter; 2007: 297. (In Russ.).
4. Angelis L., Stamelos I. A. A simulation tool for efficient analogy based cost estimation // Empirical Software Engineering. 2000. Vol. 5, № 1. P. 35–68.
5. Bakulina A. A., Shkolov D. S. Software valuation with the models of POPOMO II and SLIM. Education and law, 124–127, 2018. (In Russ.).
6. Tyutyunnikov N. N. Ocenka trudozatrat na sozdanie programmnyh sredstv dlya ranney stadii proektirovaniya po modeli COCOMO II // Ekonomika truda i upravlenie personalom. 2014. № 37. S. 129–134.
7. Boehm B. (et al.) COCOMO II Model Definition Manual. Los Angeles (CA): University of Southern California; Center for Software Engineering; 2000. (In Eng.).
8. Garmus D., Herron D. Function point analysis: measurement practices for successful software projects. Boston (MA): Addison – Wesley, 2001. (In Eng.).
9. Kerzner H. Project management: a systems approach to planning, scheduling, and controlling. 12th ed. Hoboken (NJ): John Wiley Sons; 2017. Available from: https://cmls-global.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/Project-Management-A-Systems-Approach-to-Planning-Scheduling-and-Controlling.pdf. Accessed: 15 December 2025. (In Eng.).
10. Orlov A. I. Probabilistic method for estimating work completion time and betadistribution. Controlling, 54–61, 2023. (In Russ.).
11. Dorofeev A. U., Filatov V. V., Medvedev V. M. (et al.) The methodology for the valuation of intangible assets. Naukovedenie. Internet-magazine, 1–28, 2015. (In Russ.).
12. Vald A. Sequential analysis. Moscow: Physmatgiz; 1960: 328. (In Russ.).
13. Bukharin S. V., Melnikov A. V. Combine method for sequential analysis of expertise estimation. Bulletin of the Voronezh State Technological Academy. Series: Information technologies, management and modeling, 47–51, 2011. (In Russ.).
