employee from 01.01.2022 until now
Kazan, Russian Federation
Currently, there is an increase in extremist crimes on religious grounds in the Russian Federation. The investigation of relevant criminal cases has its own specifics and requires the use of all evidentiary tools available to the investigator (inquirer), prosecutor, court. In judicial practice, such a type of evidence as judicial religious studies expertise is increasingly being used, which, due to the lack of state recognition, has a number of problems. One of them is the lack of generally accepted methods that allow experts to competently and efficiently analyze the materials submitted for research during the formation of an expert opinion. The article discusses the prospects for the development of both judicial religious studies expertise and the institute of forensic examination as a whole. On the basis of expert practice, the existing private expert methods used for the production of judicial religious studies expertise are presented. The analysis of common special methods used in the course of forming the conclusion of an expert religious scholar is carried out. The result of the work was the justification of the need to improve the methodological support of judicial religious expertise, as well as the argumentation of the possibility of creating generally accepted methods of conducting such an examination based on the proposed private expert methods. The results of the work can be applied in the formation of the research part of the expert's opinion in the production of judicial religious studies expertise.
JUDICIAL RELIGIOUS STUDIES EXPERTISE, PROSPECTS FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF FORENSIC EXPERTISE, APPROACH AND METHODOLOGY, PRIVATE EXPERT METHODS, RELIGIOUS EXTREMISM, CAUSAL METHOD, METHOD OF HISTORICISM
1. Sharov V. I. Changing the legislation on forensic examination: some circumstances preventing the adoption of a new law. Legal technique, 491-494, 2023. (In Russ.).
2. Mukaev N. K. Methodology of the science of forensic examination. Tula State University Bulletin. Economic and legal sciences, 356-359, 2016. (In Russ.).
3. Rossinskaya E. R., Galyashina E. I. Judge's handbook: forensic examination. Moscow: Prospect; 2010: 464. (In Russ.).
4. Lapina I. A. Methodology of forensic research: traditional approaches and innovations. In: Development of scientific ideas of professor R. S. Belkin in the conditions of modern challenges (to the 100th anniversary of his birth). Moscow: Academy of Management of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia; 2022: 159-163. (In Russ.).
5. Yablokov I. N. Religious studies. Textbook and educational dictionary-minimum in religious studies. Moscow: Gardariki; 2000: 536. (In Russ.).
